Compare Laptops

22 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 14 Oct 2026

Pick any two to four of the 22 ranked laptops and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M5), Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch (M5) and Apple MacBook Neo.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

Laptops compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure	Apple Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M5)	Apple Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch (M5)	Apple Apple MacBook Neo	HP HP OmniBook 5 14	Microsoft Microsoft Surface Laptop 8th Edition	Asus Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)	Lenovo Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14	Lenovo Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 (14" Intel)	Acer Acer Aspire 16 AI	Acer Acer Aspire 14 AI	Acer Acer Swift 16 AI	Framework Framework Laptop 13	Asus Asus Zenbook S14 (2026)	Asus Asus Zenbook Duo (2026)	Dell Dell XPS 14 (2026)	HP HP OmniBook 7 Aero	LG LG Gram 17 (17Z90UR)	Lenovo Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x	Lenovo Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14	Samsung Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra	MSI MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+	Apple Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M1, 2020)
Tier	S	S	A	B	B	B	B	B	B	C	C	C	C	C	D	D	D	D	D	F	F	F
Rank on this board	1 of 22	2 of 22	3 of 22	4 of 22	5 of 22	6 of 22	7 of 22	8 of 22	9 of 22	10 of 22	11 of 22	12 of 22	13 of 22	14 of 22	15 of 22	16 of 22	17 of 22	18 of 22	19 of 22	20 of 22	21 of 22	22 of 22
Ladder points	1192 LP	871 LP	787 LP	629 LP	587 LP	581 LP	567 LP	554 LP	551 LP	459 LP	428 LP	421 LP	411 LP	374 LP	345 LP	300 LP	292 LP	290 LP	230 LP	114 LP	105 LP	76 LP
Our verdict	The safest multi-year ownership in the category: fanless chassis with no moving parts to fail, aluminum unibody, and Apple named the most reliable brand in PCMag's Readers' Choice data while topping Tom's Hardware's and PCMag's current tested guides.	The same reliability platform as the Air with a stiffer chassis, a brighter and more durable display, and active cooling that reduces long-term thermal stress. Ranked below the Air only because it is more machine than most productivity buyers need, not because it is less durable.	The reliable Apple formula at the accessible end of the line: same fanless, few-things-can-break logic as the Air with Apple's long software support tail, endorsed by CNET's tested guide and treated by WIRED as the benchmark the Dell XPS 13 has to beat.	A PCMag top pick with field-leading battery life, a genuine longevity asset in daily ownership, but HP's mid-table Consumer Reports reliability record keeps it behind the more proven chassis above.	Recent Surfaces pair much-improved repairability with Microsoft's direct support channel, a real change from the line's glued-shut past.	Quiet, cool, efficient operation is a genuine longevity advantage, and it is a genuinely durable-feeling machine from a brand that rates well for reliability. Ranked below the Zenbook S14 because its lighter, thinner build is less over-engineered.	The Windows ownership champion on reputation: sturdy ThinkPad construction, business-grade warranty and support, a mature firmware update pipeline, and a line consistently cited for durability. Ranked below the Apples because the case rests on the line's record rather than model-specific evidence.	Solid Lenovo underpinnings, but the 360-degree hinge and touchscreen stack add failure points that cost it places.	The big-screen value option with owner-reported battery and build quality well above its class, but the 14-inch Aspire machines are the sharper buys.	A strong ownership story for the money with multi-day battery and a sturdy simple design, but trackpad issues, ARM-based uncertainties, and Acer's unproven reliability record make it the weakest of the picks.	Excellent value per the testing outlets, but Acer's budget-line build tolerances and support are a clear step below the names above it.	Longevity by design: the only mainstream laptop explicitly built to be repaired, upgraded, and kept alive indefinitely, which is the logical extreme of ownership over years. Held out of the top four only by its shorter track record and thinner support ecosystem, not by its design.	Excellent build quality, no major thermal throttling, and strong battery life per Gadgetmatch and independent reviewers, with generous memory keeping it usable deep into its life, from a brand that sits near the top of the Consumer Reports reliability ranking.	Genuinely innovative and well made, but the second screen is a luxury you pay for, which dents its value score.	Tom's Hardware's best ultralight on review merit with premium build, but dragged down this lens by Dell's second-to-last Consumer Reports reliability placement and the XPS line's history of proprietary-port and repair-hostility choices.	A top-five laptop of 2026 on pure merit per TechRadar, docked here because premium ultraportable positioning is exactly what the value lens discounts.	A sponsored unboxing with a shrug from the comments. Lightness impresses, community conviction does not.	Excellent battery life for very little money, but its modest performance ceiling keeps it below the more capable budget options.	For browser-first users, delivers near-ultrabook polish for half the money.	Outclassed at its price: creator-class specs with a thin service network and no place on any reliability-reputation shortlist. A MacBook Pro 14 owns better for the same money.	The worst ownership risk on the board: MSI's non-gaming lines pair unproven build consistency with the weakest after-sales support reputation among major brands. Any pick above is safer.	A famously durable machine, but buying one new in 2026 means 8GB of RAM and a macOS support clock with little left on it. The MacBook Neo or M5 Air is the correct cheap-Mac answer.
What reviewers rate	Fanless design means no moving parts to fail Aluminum unibody construction Apple rated a stalwart for reliability in PCMag's Readers' Choice brand survey Named best laptop overall in current tested guides	Stiffer, more protective chassis than the Air Brighter, more durable display Active cooling reduces long-term thermal stress Backed by Apple's strong brand reliability reputation	Premium MacBook look and feel at a much lower price Enough performance for most people Fanless design with few things that can break Backed by Apple's long software support tail	Field-leading battery life Listed among PCMag's top tested picks OLED panel at a mainstream price Incredible 34-hour battery life	Much-improved serviceability over past generations Microsoft's direct enterprise support channel	Runs quietly, coolly, and efficiently when not pushed Low thermal load is a longevity advantage Roughly ten to fourteen hours of real use per charge with fast charging Durable-feeling build from a brand that rates well for reliability	Chassis designed for daily abuse over years Business-class warranty and support Mature firmware update pipeline ThinkPad line consistently cited for sturdiness and quality	Solid Lenovo underpinnings Anchored by Lenovo's strong failure-rate and lifespan data	Large productive canvas without a premium-brand surcharge Owners report amazing battery life Owners report vibrant screens Very good build quality for the class	Measured just under 24 hours of battery life in testing Sturdy and simple design Described as an elite, future-proof processing champion for multitasking Strong endurance per unit of spend	Excellent value per the testing outlets Swift family named LaptopMag's best budget laptop	Explicitly designed to be repaired and upgraded Every part can be replaced, keeping the machine alive indefinitely The logical extreme of long-term ownership value The repairability-and-longevity pick in Wired's current guide	Stunning, solid build quality 3K OLED 120Hz display Powerful performance without major thermal throttling Excellent battery life	Dual-screen design genuinely useful for multitaskers Well-executed, innovative design Current, credible 2-in-1-adjacent option	Named best ultralight laptop in Tom's Hardware's benchmarked guide Premium build quality Included in a current tested best-Windows-laptops roundup RTINGS' best Dell laptop tested	A genuinely excellent ultraportable Placed in the top five of everything launched in 2026 by a veteran TechRadar reviewer HP makes BGR's four-brand reliability-reputation shortlist Major-brand service network and parts availability	Marvelled at as the world's lightest 17-inch laptop with RTX Large exposure via Unbox Therapy (394k views)	Excellent battery life for very little money Real efficiency-per-dollar from the Snapdragon platform Fine for basic productivity	Premium-feeling screen Strong battery life Smooth everyday speed A fraction of ultrabook money	Creator-class specs Premium Samsung hardware	2-in-1 convertible 'Flip' form factor AI+ branded feature set	Famously durable hardware Cheapest Mac still on shelves
Where it falls short	You pay an Apple premium for a similar everyday experience Failure rates still trail ThinkPad's industry-best numbers	Most productivity buyers pay extra for headroom they will never use	Compromises in ports and headroom	Nothing recorded	The line's glued-shut past still colors its track record	Lighter, thinner build is less over-engineered than the Zenbook S14 ASUS warranty service remains slower than Apple or ThinkPad channels	The ThinkPad name carries a premium Price-to-value is weaker for typical buyers	360-degree hinge adds failure points Touchscreen stack adds further failure risk over years of use	Nothing recorded	Trackpad issues flagged by reviewers ARM-based uncertainties Acer's brand reliability record is not among the leaders	Budget-line build tolerances a step below the leaders Acer support is a clear step below the names above it	Shorter track record than established rivals Smaller support ecosystem Small company's support capacity is a real limitation	Aims at being thinner than it needs to be The price reflects the ambition more than the experience	You pay a meaningful premium for the second panel The weakest of the recommended options on value	Dell sits second-to-last among eleven brands in Consumer Reports reliability data XPS line has a history of proprietary ports and repair-hostile design Priced as a premium object Graded a straight D by a widely circulated 2026 avoid-list	Positioned as a premium ultraportable rather than value-first Consumer-line HP support experiences are inconsistent	A paid LG partnership Pulse here is marketing volume, not owner conviction	Not fast Modest performance ceiling versus more capable budget options	Only makes sense for buyers whose workload lives in a browser	Thin laptop service network relative to its marketing spend Absent from BGR's four-brand reliability-reputation shortlist Outclassed at its price; a MacBook Pro 14 owns better for the same money	Unproven build consistency in MSI's non-gaming lines Weakest after-sales support reputation among major brands The worst long-term ownership risk in the category	Base config still ships with 8GB of RAM, which 2026 buyer guidance says to avoid Six years old with little macOS support left on the clock Fits the exact cheap-outdated-model risk profile Which? warns against
Evidence behind it	14 sources across 14 outlets	17 sources across 16 outlets	173 sources across 93 outlets	2 sources across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	9 sources across 7 outlets	54 sources across 39 outlets	57 sources across 34 outlets	30 sources across 29 outlets	19 sources across 16 outlets	8 sources across 8 outlets	28 sources across 25 outlets	42 sources across 33 outlets	7 sources across 6 outlets	102 sources across 86 outlets	71 sources across 47 outlets	18 sources across 14 outlets	7 sources across 5 outlets	20 sources across 19 outlets	37 sources across 28 outlets	37 sources across 32 outlets	27 sources across 26 outlets	6 sources across 6 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid	Not flagged	1 of 10 research runs	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	1 of 3 research runs	Not flagged	2 of 11 research runs	Not flagged	Not flagged	1 of 5 research runs	Not flagged	3 of 8 research runs	1 of 6 research runs	3 of 6 research runs
Announced	Mar 2026	Mar 2026	Mar 2026	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Jan 2026	Aug 2020	May 2025	Jan 2026	Jan 2026	Not recorded	Jan 2026	Jan 2026	Not recorded	Not recorded	Jan 2026	Feb 2025	Jun 2025	Jan 2026	Not recorded	Nov 2020
Where to buy	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.