Best Earbuds

Compare Earbuds

24 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 16 Oct 2026

Pick any two to four of the 24 ranked earbuds and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Sony WF-1000XM6, Apple AirPods Pro 3 and Technics EAH-AZ100.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S
A
B
C
D
F
Earbuds compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Sony WF-1000XM6 Sony Sony WF-1000XM6 Apple AirPods Pro 3 Apple Apple AirPods Pro 3 Technics EAH-AZ100 Technics Technics EAH-AZ100 Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC Anker Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC CMF Buds 2 Plus CMF CMF Buds 2 Plus 7Hz Salnotes Zero 7Hz 7Hz Salnotes Zero EarFun Air Pro 4 EarFun EarFun Air Pro 4 Anker Soundcore Liberty 5 Pro Anker Anker Soundcore Liberty 5 Pro Nothing Ear Nothing Nothing Ear Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro Samsung Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro Nothing Ear 3 Nothing Nothing Ear 3 Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 Google Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 Roseselsa Ceramics Ultra Roseselsa Roseselsa Ceramics Ultra Sony LinkBuds Fit Sony Sony LinkBuds Fit Sony WF-C710N Sony Sony WF-C710N Anker Soundcore Space A40 Anker Anker Soundcore Space A40 Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 Bowers & Wilkins Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 4 Sennheiser Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 4 Sony WF-1000XM5 Sony Sony WF-1000XM5 Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro Samsung Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro Apple AirPods 4 with ANC Apple Apple AirPods 4 with ANC JLab JBuds Mini JLab JLab JBuds Mini Jabra Elite 10 Gen 2 Jabra Jabra Elite 10 Gen 2
Tier S S S A A A A A B B C C C C C C C D D D F F F F
Rank on this board 1 of 24 2 of 24 3 of 24 4 of 24 5 of 24 6 of 24 7 of 24 8 of 24 9 of 24 10 of 24 11 of 24 12 of 24 13 of 24 14 of 24 15 of 24 16 of 24 17 of 24 18 of 24 19 of 24 20 of 24 21 of 24 22 of 24 23 of 24 24 of 24
Ladder points 1217 LP 1118 LP 1094 LP 852 LP 804 LP 701 LP 655 LP 651 LP 549 LP 500 LP 500 LP 499 LP 471 LP 455 LP 420 LP 404 LP 391 LP 349 LP 317 LP 233 LP 195 LP 172 LP 142 LP 42 LP
Our verdict the current Sony flagship reviews superbly and Sony's firmware support is dependable, but the WF line has a documented history of in-bud battery fade by year two or three, which caps it under this lens despite excellent everything-else. Apple's firmware support cadence is the longest and most reliable in the category, which matters more over years than any spec. The sealed battery remains the ceiling on its lifespan, as with all TWS. the current consensus #1 among test labs, with the battery life and mature firmware platform that predict well for year-three ownership. The strongest combination of "reviews brilliantly" and "built to still be working." the current overall winner in mainstream testing, and Bose's warranty and fit hardware have a reasonable multi-year track record. Carries the usual TWS battery-sealed-in-the-shell risk, but it is the safest flagship to own into year three. Anker's warranty and support reputation is the best in the budget tier, and this model has the largest installed base and longest track record of Soundcore's current lineup. The value pick you can still recommend years later. Flagship-adjacent measured ANC from a budget sub-brand, the single best performance-per-dollar result in the retrieved evidence. Nothing else here matches what it delivers for what it costs. no battery to degrade, no firmware to abandon, a replaceable cable, and a metal build. It removes every dominant TWS failure mode in one stroke, which makes it close to unbeatable for pure long-term ownership even though it lacks ANC and smart features. the standout value winner of the current test cycle, with the feature set of flagships from two years ago at a budget tier where replacement rather than repair is the realistic endgame anyway. the more complete Soundcore flagship with better ANC and three-device multipoint, backed by Anker's support reputation. Ranked below the Liberty 4 NC only because it is newer and has less real-world longevity data behind it. Near-flagship feature set at mid-price money, the strongest mid-price all-rounder for buyers who want polish without the flagship tax. The current Android-ecosystem staple. Android Central's tested roundup lists the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro among the handful of earbuds it actually recommends alongside the Sony, Bose and Bowers & Wilkins flagships, which is exactly where the consensus places Samsung's best in-ears. RTINGS' current mid-range pick, a genuine consensus slot in the most measurement-driven guide. Solid build, consistent feature drops, no systemic failures. The sensible long-term pick for Android users who don't want Sony's price. LDAC, long battery and a rich, balanced tuning that punches far above its class. Enormous overdelivery for the money. Wirecutter's top pick and a dependable mid-price all-rounder. Ranks below the flagships because it is outclassed on ANC and features, not on reliability. Placed third overall in the newest roundup, an unusually strong showing for a mid-range model, but under-corroborated compared with the products above it. RTINGS' benchmark budget pick with LDAC and a fifty-hour case battery. It set the value standard and still holds it. The sound-quality flagship the specialist press keeps in its top group. Fewer citations only because fewer outlets test at this tier. Still top-five in a current roundup on sound quality alone, but it is the oldest design in the pick list and its successor exists. the most cross-shopped prior-gen flagship in the category, and the one whose dominant failure mode, in-bud battery fade, is furthest along. A refurb unit is a battery with a head start. Newer than the two traps below it, but documented quality-control problems and a divisive design make it the worst flagship-tier cross-shop in the category. Buy the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. The marketing-push pick: weak ANC measured by TechGearLab, a mediocre opinion score from SoundGuys, and a short battery per Tom's Guide. The AirPods Pro 3 is the Apple buy that actually holds up. The tiny form factor that makes it charming is exactly what makes it a poor long-term owner: easy to lose, hard to repair, IP55 at best, and unreliable find-my per owner reports. The Sony WF-C710N is the durable small-bud alternative. Hardware that reviewed well, orphaned by Jabra's exit from consumer audio. No firmware future, no parts future, no reason to buy at any discount. Buy the Technics EAH-AZ100 instead.
What reviewers rate
  • dependable firmware support
  • Top-tier ANC performance
  • Rated as best wireless earbuds in RTINGS testing
  • Top overall ranking in the latest 2026 roundup
  • longest firmware support cadence
  • best mix of sound, fit and features
  • Measured ANC leader
  • Optimized for iPhone integration
  • exceptional noise isolation
  • long battery life
  • mature firmware platform
  • built to still be working
  • standout noise cancellation especially against airplane noise
  • reasonable multi-year track record
  • Bose's warranty
  • Class-leading ANC especially against airplane noise
  • best warranty and support reputation in budget tier
  • longest track record
  • Strong active noise cancellation
  • Supports LDAC for high-quality audio
  • ANC performance matches higher-priced flagship models
  • Budget sub-brand delivers flagship-like noise reduction
  • Hits 83 percent average noise reduction, nearly matching flagship performance
  • Delivers flagship-adjacent measured performance from a budget pair
  • replaceable cable
  • no battery to degrade
  • no firmware to abandon
  • Wired IEM with tuning that outperforms far costlier earbuds
  • standout value winner
  • feature set of flagships from two years ago
  • budget tier fits replacement endgame
  • Flagship-class features at budget pricing
  • stronger ANC
  • three-device multipoint
  • better feature set
  • Standout call quality
  • Hi-res codec support
  • Effective ANC
  • Distinctive design
  • Polished app
  • Recommended by Android Central alongside flagship models
  • Great audio reproduction accuracy with a smooth, warm sound signature
  • Impactful bass, clean mids and smooth highs
  • Practical everyday features
  • RTINGS' mid-range pick, slotted directly beneath the Sony flagship
  • Strong endorsement from the most lab-driven outlet in the field
  • Cheaper alternative that could sound better than AirPods Pro 3
  • Pitched as 'The AirPods Pro 3 Killer'
  • Consistent firmware feature drops for the Pixel Buds line
  • Solid build with no systemic QC issues reported
  • Google's hardware support has matured
  • Best long-term ownership proposition for Pixel/Android users outside the Sony
  • Hi-res LDAC support
  • Long battery life that punches well above its class
  • Rich, versatile, broadly excellent sound with a clean, balanced tuning
  • Reddit thread calls them 'Awesome budget earbuds'
  • Wirecutter's current top wireless-earbud pick
  • Sound great, fit great, with features that work well on any phone
  • Same Sony support infrastructure as the flagship at a lower price
  • No flagged reliability pattern
  • Current mid-range ANC earbud
  • Strong showing in latest roundup
  • Benefits from Sony's firmware support cadence and service network
  • A mainstream budget-ANC recommendation
  • RTINGS' best-in-class budget pick
  • Supports LDAC
  • Fifty-hour case battery
  • Earned best-value-under-its-class award
  • Audiophile-tier sound quality in the mainstream TWS market
  • Kept in Android Central's top group alongside the Sony and Bose flagships
  • The sound-quality-first choice over feature checklists
  • Premium materials and construction
  • Sound-quality-first pick
  • Top-five placement in a current roundup
  • Two-year warranty, double the industry norm
  • Long firmware support tail across the Momentum TW line
  • Very good performance
  • Unmatched ANC and excellent sound
  • Named Best Overall by multiple roundups
  • Still excellent hardware
  • Reviews well on sound quality
  • A realistic cross-shop for Galaxy phone owners
  • Strong sound
  • The best ANC in an open-ear design
  • A legitimate alternative for buyers who cannot tolerate in-ear tips
  • A real cross-shop, listed among PCMag's tested picks
  • Impressive sound for the money
  • Ultra-compact size
  • Very cheap
  • Hardware reviewed well when new
Where it falls short
  • documented battery fade by year two or three
  • Flagship-level price
  • Costs flagship money
  • Predecessor XM5 generation suffered widely reported uneven battery drain
  • sealed battery limits lifespan
  • Ecosystem lock-in limits compatibility
  • Premium-tier price
  • Fit can be insecure for some ear shapes
  • Flagship pricing
  • Fewer outlets have re-tested it this cycle
  • Slightly smaller support footprint than Sony or Apple
  • sealed battery limits lifespan
  • Most expensive way to get comparable performance
  • Battery-life complaints recur
  • Battery life is the main compromise
  • Built on an older platform, with newer Soundcore models available
  • Newer models are arriving to challenge it
  • Brand-new sub-brand with no track record on firmware longevity or failure rates
  • Sound rated merely good, not great by TechGearLab
  • Owner feedback reports comfort pain after two to three hours of wear
  • lacks ANC and smart features
  • Lacks active noise cancellation
  • No built-in microphone or wireless capability
  • Wired design limits portability
  • lower lifespan ceiling than flagship
  • Support infrastructure thinner than Sony, Apple or Anker's
  • less real-world longevity data
  • Warm, bass-forward default tuning
  • Much of the loudest praise is sponsor-adjacent or outright sponsored
  • Its praise is amplified by paid promotion
Nothing recorded
  • SoundGuys calls them a bit of a fixer-upper
  • Softer overall polish than rival flagships
  • Ranked fifth (last) in a five-flagship ANC shootout
  • Only six hours of battery with ANC on
  • Comes with trade-offs
  • Confusing lineage (Ear, Ear 2, Ear, Ear A, now Ear 3)
  • Support is mostly one high-profile video
  • Support network still less proven than Sony's or Apple's over many years
  • A little bass forward
  • Brand name is a 'tongue twister' (joke con in the thread)
  • Outclassed on ANC and features by the flagships
  • Cannot compete with flagships on sound or features
  • ANC comes with an annoying rumble
  • An older model superseded in raw performance by newer rivals
  • A budget product, not a flagship alternative
  • Some battery degradation is inevitable at this price
  • Expensive
  • Ownership advantages over the Sony WF-1000XM6 don't justify the price for most buyers
  • Oldest design in the pick list
  • Successor model exists
  • Dead earbuds reported
  • Cracking sound
  • dominant battery fade failure mode advanced
  • market shifted to refurbished units
  • Superseded by newer model
  • Older battery generation than the current flagship
  • Build-quality-control problems reported at launch
  • Divisive blade-stem design
  • Superseded by newer model
  • Launch marred by a genuine QC scandal: shipments paused over ear tips tearing and unit-to-unit quality variance
  • ANC reduces ambient noise by only about 10 decibels across the mid-bass to high-mid range
  • Mediocre mean opinion score of 3.6 from SoundGuys
  • Five-hour battery life is not great per Tom's Guide's long-term testing
  • Outclassed by the AirPods Pro 3 for ANC and battery life
  • The main issue is that they are small, per SoundGuys
  • Only an IP55 water-resistance rating
  • Tiny cases are the most lost and most mishandled format in the category
  • Owner reports complain the find-my tracking is unreliable
  • Jabra exited the consumer earbud business entirely
  • Firmware support is on borrowed time and the app is a dead end
  • Replacement parts and warranty coverage will only thin out
  • Disqualifying over a few years of ownership regardless of hardware quality
Evidence behind it 63 sources across 52 outlets 116 sources across 90 outlets 39 sources across 32 outlets 17 sources across 15 outlets 34 sources across 32 outlets 7 sources across 7 outlets 29 sources across 26 outlets 64 sources across 50 outlets 76 sources across 65 outlets 59 sources across 45 outlets 69 sources across 58 outlets 71 sources across 57 outlets 55 sources across 46 outlets 23 sources across 20 outlets 34 sources across 32 outlets 10 sources across 10 outlets 50 sources across 45 outlets 65 sources across 53 outlets 16 sources across 16 outlets 36 sources across 32 outlets 37 sources across 33 outlets 6 sources across 5 outlets 31 sources across 29 outlets 21 sources across 19 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 5 research runs Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 6 research runs 2 of 10 research runs 9 of 16 research runs 3 of 7 research runs 3 of 7 research runs 1 of 2 research runs 3 of 8 research runs
Announced Not recorded Sept 2025 Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Jun 2026 Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Feb 2025 Sept 2024 Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.