Compare Smart Speakers
17 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 20 Oct 2026
Pick any two to four of the 17 ranked smart speakers and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Sonos Era 100, Apple HomePod (2nd Gen) and Amazon Echo Dot Max.
Choose what to compare
3 of 4 chosen
S
B
C
D
F
| Measure | Sonos Sonos Era 100 | Apple Apple HomePod (2nd Gen) | Amazon Amazon Echo Dot Max | Amazon Amazon Echo Studio (2nd Gen) | Sonos Sonos Era 300 | Google Google Home Speaker (2026) | Apple Apple HomePod mini | Amazon Amazon Echo Dot (5th Gen) | JBL JBL Authentics 500 | Bose Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker | Sonos Sonos Move 2 | Amazon Amazon Echo (4th Gen) | Bose Bose Smart Speaker 500 | Google Google Nest Audio | Denon Denon Home 600 | Google Google Nest Mini | Amazon Amazon Echo Pop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | S | S | B | B | B | B | C | D | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
| Rank on this board | 1 of 17 | 2 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 7 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 17 of 17 |
| Ladder points | 1383 LP | 1051 LP | 910 LP | 596 LP | 583 LP | 558 LP | 543 LP | 453 LP | 307 LP | 148 LP | 131 LP | 78 LP | 50 LP | 48 LP | 22 LP | 0 LP | 0 LP |
| Our verdict | Superb hardware on a mature platform, and What Hi-Fi's stated safe bet for the category. The 2024 app stumble is the reason it does not take the top spot. | The best-tested speaker in the category per What Hi-Fi, with the best build, firmware-support and service reputation of any brand here. Ecosystem lock-in is the only real cost. | PCMag's most well-rounded Alexa speaker and #2 Overall at undig.me, current-generation with Amazon's long update tail behind it. | The bass anchor of a well-supported ecosystem, ranked mid-board because the design lineage is older than the Dot Max's. | Undig.me's #1 Overall and a What Hi-Fi-endorsed platform, held back one slot only because more complex hardware means more potential failure points over years. | Strong reviews from PCMag and Plugged-In Home, but brand-new, finicky in early use, and partly subscription-gated, so its multi-year ownership story is unproven. | Ranked 6th... actually 7th on the board: the most proven, lowest-risk ownership story on the board, ranked here purely because its sound ceiling is low. | Still functional and still stocked, but outclassed by its own successor, the Echo Dot Max, in every review that matters. | RTINGS' best smart speaker tested, with dual-assistant redundancy that hedges the biggest longevity risk in this category. | Ranked 14th and last: coasting on brand reputation in a category Bose has stopped competing in, and the weakest ownership bet on the board. | Excellent build and sound, but a sealed battery makes it the only pick whose core component is designed to degrade. | A former flagship trading on old awards, superseded within Amazon's own current lineup. | A 2018 design trading on brand equity with a shrinking feature set and an uncertain platform future. The Era 100 beats it in every way that matters over time. | The old Google pick that buyers still reach for out of habit. Viewlenses still pitches it as “best overall” for Google users, and Whatnotsell lists it as Best Google Assistant Speaker, but Google’s own current answer is the new Google Home Speaker, which CNET reports delivers 2.5× the bass of the Nest Mini line and which PCMag now slots as the Gemini-ecosystem pick. Nest Audio is coasting on a reputation earned years ago. Buy the [PICK] Google Home Speaker (2026) instead. | Handsome and understated, but the expensive top of an aging line that the Era 300 and Authentics 500 beat outright. | Aging hardware with weak sound, outclassed by the Echo Dot in its own head-to-head. Buy the Echo Dot Max or the Google Home Speaker instead. | RTINGS' budget pick and fine for bedrooms, but it is the most basic product on the board and the Echo Dot (5th Gen) is only a small step up for much more speaker. |
| What reviewers rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where it falls short |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evidence behind it | 59 sources across 57 outlets | 8 sources across 8 outlets | 19 sources across 18 outlets | 36 sources across 31 outlets | 38 sources across 34 outlets | 38 sources across 32 outlets | 26 sources across 22 outlets | 30 sources across 27 outlets | 19 sources across 15 outlets | 32 sources across 26 outlets | 55 sources across 46 outlets | 12 sources across 11 outlets | 7 sources across 7 outlets | 19 sources across 18 outlets | 25 sources across 24 outlets | 24 sources across 22 outlets | 20 sources across 18 outlets |
| Flagged as one to avoid | Not flagged | 1 of 19 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | 2 of 18 research runs | 3 of 14 research runs | Not flagged | 3 of 19 research runs | 4 of 17 research runs | 2 of 4 research runs | 2 of 13 research runs | 8 of 18 research runs | 3 of 7 research runs | 5 of 14 research runs | 5 of 8 research runs | 8 of 13 research runs | 4 of 10 research runs |
| Announced | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Oct 2020 | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Where to buy | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it |
Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.