Compare Headphones

16 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 19 Aug 2026

Pick any two to four of the 16 ranked headphones and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Sony WH-1000XM6, Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless and Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen).

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

Headphones compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure	Sony Sony WH-1000XM6	Sennheiser Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless	Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen)	Beyerdynamic Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro X	1More 1More SonoFlow Pro	Bowers & Wilkins Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3	Sony Sony WH-CH720N	Sennheiser Sennheiser HDB 630	Anker Anker Soundcore Space One Pro	Focal Focal Bathys Mg	Audio-Technica Audio-Technica ATH-M50x	Sony Sony WH-1000XM5	Anker Anker Soundcore Life Q30	Sonos Sonos Ace	Apple AirPods Max	Beats Beats Studio Pro
Tier	S	A	A	B	B	C	C	C	C	C	C	D	F	F	F	F
Rank on this board	1 of 16	2 of 16	3 of 16	4 of 16	5 of 16	6 of 16	7 of 16	8 of 16	9 of 16	10 of 16	11 of 16	12 of 16	13 of 16	14 of 16	15 of 16	16 of 16
Ladder points	1046 LP	828 LP	763 LP	632 LP	544 LP	461 LP	456 LP	429 LP	421 LP	384 LP	366 LP	358 LP	203 LP	72 LP	21 LP	1 LP
Our verdict	Best overall build, ANC and longevity.	Excellent sound and comfort with durable construction.	Wirecutter names it a top pick for “comfort, great sound, and excellent ANC.” What Hi-Fi? awards it the “Best Noise-Cancelling Headphone” title.	RTINGS lists it as the best wired reference headphone for its “neutral soundstage and excellent detail.” What Hi-Fi? calls it a “must-have audiophile” set.	High-resolution audio in a durable package.	Premium build and long-term reliability.	Affordable, solid build for its price.	Comfortable, well-built for extended use.	Good support for the money, but the folding mechanism and budget cells will not match the big three's lifespan.	A high-end pair that delivers an expansive soundstage and precise imaging. RTINGS rates it the best open-back for audiophiles; What Hi-Fi? calls it “the most detailed headphones.”	Reliable construction and long lifespan.	Advanced features with proven durability.	An aging model superseded within Anker's own lineup; skip it for the Space One Pro.	Lacks robust ANC and support compared to focused models.	High price but unreliable durability and limited battery life.	Wirecutter names it a top pick for “great soundstage and comfortable fit” among premium over-ear headphones. What Hi-Fi? lists it as a solid value option.
What reviewers rate	Industry-leading active noise cancellation Excellent battery life Durable construction Effective noise cancellation	High-fidelity audio Comfortable fit for long sessions Robust build Rich sound	Comfort Great sound Excellent ANC Strong ANC for price	Neutral soundstage Excellent detail Wide soundstage Neutral, detailed audio	High-resolution sound Robust design Long-term durability Clear mids	Premium construction Excellent soundstage Reliable durability Luxurious build	Solid ANC Great battery life Very affordable Great value	Comfortable fit Solid build quality Good performance Balanced sound	Anker's support reputation is genuinely good for the price tier Current model with active firmware attention	Expansive soundstage Precise imaging High detail AVForums' tester calls it 'the best high end wireless set you can buy'	Durable build Consistent performance over years Good sound quality Accurate monitoring	Advanced wireless tech Excellent ANC Durable build Solid ANC	Not a bad product in isolation	All-round headphone design Comfortable fit Good all-round audio Spatial audio support	Premium design Integrated Apple ecosystem Realistically cross-shopped at its price, showing up in serious buyers' shortlists (e.g. the ASR community's top three)	Great soundstage Comfortable fit Stylish design Convenient connectivity
Where it falls short	Nothing recorded	Early firmware bugs, though now patched history	Bose's app firmware is occasionally buggy	Open-back, wired format serves fewer buyers	Sound refinement is thinner than pricier models	Resale and repair network thinner than Sony/Bose	Flimsier plastic build	Too new for long-term failure data; unproven past year one	Folding mechanism is a long-term weak point Budget cells will not match the big three's lifespan	Expensive out-of-warranty repair exposure	Nothing recorded	Weaker ANC Lower battery life Older design Higher price relative to newer model	Aging model Superseded inside Anker's own line by newer Space-series models with meaningfully better ANC and sound Paying for it in 2026 buys yesterday's tech	Lagging ANC performance No firmware updates Weak warranty A first-generation product at a second-generation price	Fragile construction Short battery life Very expensive Heavy weight	Narrow soundstage Bass over-emphasis Mediocre ANC Consistently found outclassed on ANC, build, and sound by the Sony and Bose flagships at its list price
Evidence behind it	47 sources across 33 outlets	18 sources across 15 outlets	22 sources across 19 outlets	22 sources across 20 outlets	26 sources across 21 outlets	45 sources across 34 outlets	42 sources across 36 outlets	81 sources across 56 outlets	16 sources across 13 outlets	18 sources across 16 outlets	44 sources across 39 outlets	28 sources across 23 outlets	42 sources across 36 outlets	54 sources across 42 outlets	90 sources across 67 outlets	54 sources across 45 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	2 of 9 research runs	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	1 of 9 research runs	3 of 9 research runs	1 of 4 research runs	3 of 8 research runs	5 of 9 research runs	4 of 6 research runs
Announced	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Dec 2020	Not recorded
Where to buy	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.