Best Metal Detectors

Compare Metal Detectors

14 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 4 Sept 2026

Pick any two to four of the 14 ranked metal detectors and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Minelab Vanquish 440 Metal Detector, XP Deus II HF2 Metal Detector and Garrett AT MAX Metal Detector.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

A
B
C
D
F
Metal Detectors compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Minelab Vanquish 440 Metal Detector Minelab Minelab Vanquish 440 Metal Detector XP Deus II HF2 Metal Detector XP XP Deus II HF2 Metal Detector Garrett AT MAX Metal Detector Garrett Garrett AT MAX Metal Detector Minelab Equinox 900 Metal Detector Minelab Minelab Equinox 900 Metal Detector Nokta FindX Pro Metal Detector Nokta Nokta FindX Pro Metal Detector Minelab Manticore Metal Detector Minelab Minelab Manticore Metal Detector Minelab Equinox 700 Metal Detector Minelab Minelab Equinox 700 Metal Detector Garrett ACE Apex Metal Detector Garrett Garrett ACE Apex Metal Detector Garrett ACE 300 Metal Detector Garrett Garrett ACE 300 Metal Detector Minelab Legend 2 Metal Detector Minelab Minelab Legend 2 Metal Detector Garrett ACE 250 Metal Detector Garrett Garrett ACE 250 Metal Detector Bounty Hunter Metal Detector Bounty Hunter Bounty Hunter Metal Detector Gold Monster 1000 Metal Detector Gold Monster Gold Monster 1000 Metal Detector Bounty Hunter Gold Digger Metal Detector Bounty Hunter Bounty Hunter Gold Digger Metal Detector
Tier A A A A B C C D D D D D D F
Rank on this board 1 of 14 2 of 14 3 of 14 4 of 14 5 of 14 6 of 14 7 of 14 8 of 14 9 of 14 10 of 14 11 of 14 12 of 14 13 of 14 14 of 14
Ladder points 801 LP 752 LP 703 LP 674 LP 638 LP 492 LP 371 LP 323 LP 315 LP 313 LP 310 LP 278 LP 210 LP 109 LP
Our verdict Its balance of features, affordability, and beginner-friendliness makes it a strong contender in the entry-level market. The community consistently highlights its advanced features and versatility, making it the top choice for serious users seeking performance and customization options. A reliable and waterproof all-around detector that consistently receives positive mentions for its depth and ease of use. Its multi-frequency capabilities and overall performance place it high on the list, though some find it complex initially. The combination of portability and power makes this a very desirable detector for those who travel or want something compact without sacrificing performance. Its consistent promotion as the "best of the best" for beach hunting, coupled with its strong performance in water, secures its high ranking. A solid beginner’s choice. Depth and performance are good but not as refined as higher-tier models. The improvements over previous ACE models, particularly in depth and discrimination, justify its placement above older ACE versions. Good entry-level performer, but limited depth and sensitivity compared to higher-priced competitors. A good upgrade from basic detectors, offering a step up in features without breaking the bank. Considered outdated by many in the community, with users recommending upgrades such as the ACE Apex or Minelab Vanquish. While affordable, the community expresses concerns about build quality and performance compared to other brands, with owners reporting it being underpowered. Its specialized nature limits its appeal and versatility compared to general-purpose detectors. Frequently criticized for poor performance and cheap construction, making it a detector to avoid.
What reviewers rate
  • Balanced feature set for beginners
  • Affordable price point
  • User-friendly operation
  • Excellent depth for its class
  • Advanced multi-frequency capability
  • Highly versatile for different detecting scenarios
  • Clear audio signatures for bottle caps
  • High-frequency capability
  • Fully waterproof construction
  • Good depth performance
  • Reliable overall operation
  • Robust construction
  • Multi-frequency operation for versatile detection
  • High overall performance
  • Multi-frequency capability
  • Durable casing
  • Compact size
  • Powerful detection capability
  • Excellent portability
  • Low price point
  • Top performer for beach and water hunting
  • Excellent underwater detection
  • Advanced target identification
  • Waterproof design
  • Easy to use for beginners
  • Solid performance
  • Affordable price
  • Lightweight
  • Improved depth capability
  • Better discrimination than earlier ACE models
  • Lightweight construction
  • Strong performance at mid-price point
  • Affordable for beginners
  • Solid basic feature set
  • Entry-level price
  • Balanced performance
  • Solid feature set for an upgrade
  • Affordable price relative to performance
  • Solid construction
  • Reliable performance for basic tasks
  • Sturdy construction
  • Lightweight
  • Effective at locating gold
  • Good depth for gold hunting
  • Strong target separation
  • Reputable brand in gold prospecting
  • Affordable price point
Where it falls short
  • Higher price compared to similar performance models
Nothing recorded
  • Depth less than top Minelab models
  • Can be complex for beginners
  • Limited depth
  • Fewer advanced features than higher-tier models
Nothing recorded
  • Less depth than Equinox 900
  • Fewer features
  • Higher price relative to performance
  • Depth and sensitivity lower than comparable models
  • Price not justified by performance gains
  • Limited depth and sensitivity
  • Lower sensitivity
  • Fewer features
  • Firmware no longer updated
  • Lacks multi-frequency capability
  • Becomes obsolete quickly
  • Higher cost relative to similar performance
  • Outdated technology
  • Lower performance than newer models
  • Build quality issues
  • Underpowered performance
  • Limited depth
  • High price for features
  • Limited versatility for other metals
  • Niche focus reduces overall usefulness
  • Limited sensitivity compared to peers
  • Limited depth
  • Poor performance
  • Cheap construction
  • Inconsistent depth
  • Poor target identification
Evidence behind it 13 sources across 10 outlets 20 sources across 14 outlets 18 sources across 15 outlets 34 sources across 24 outlets 11 sources across 9 outlets 66 sources across 40 outlets 18 sources across 17 outlets 21 sources across 17 outlets 21 sources across 16 outlets 28 sources across 24 outlets 35 sources across 30 outlets 2 sources across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 18 sources across 16 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 7 research runs 1 of 5 research runs 2 of 4 research runs 2 of 5 research runs 2 of 7 research runs 2 of 3 research runs 2 of 3 research runs 4 of 7 research runs 4 of 5 research runs
Announced Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.