Best Chromebooks

Compare Chromebooks

12 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 19 Aug 2026

Pick any two to four of the 12 ranked chromebooks and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Asus Chromebook Plus CX34, Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 714 and Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S
A
B
C
D
F
Chromebooks compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Asus Chromebook Plus CX34 Asus Asus Chromebook Plus CX34 Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 714 Acer Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 714 Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Lenovo Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 514 CP514-5HN Acer Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 514 CP514-5HN Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 514 CB514-6H/T Acer Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 514 CB514-6H/T Acer Chromebook Plus 516 Acer Acer Chromebook Plus 516 Asus Chromebook CX15 Asus Asus Chromebook CX15 Dell Chromebook 13 (2026) Dell Dell Chromebook 13 (2026) HP Chromebook Plus 15.6-inch HP HP Chromebook Plus 15.6-inch Lenovo Chromebook Flex 5 (2026) Lenovo Lenovo Chromebook Flex 5 (2026) Acer Chromebook Spin 312 Acer Acer Chromebook Spin 312 Dell Chromebook 13 Budget Variant Dell Dell Chromebook 13 Budget Variant
Tier S S A A B C C C C C D F
Rank on this board 1 of 12 2 of 12 3 of 12 4 of 12 5 of 12 6 of 12 7 of 12 8 of 12 9 of 12 10 of 12 11 of 12 12 of 12
Ladder points 905 LP 845 LP 769 LP 702 LP 558 LP 493 LP 447 LP 397 LP 396 LP 376 LP 294 LP 81 LP
Our verdict The most reliable build, excellent battery life, and consistent firmware updates make it the best long-term investment. Premium convertible design with strong performance; its higher price is justified by longevity. Robust chassis and a solid trackpad give it a slight edge over the CX34 in everyday durability. The video from Chrome Unboxed calls this convertible the best, and its high view count shows strong community approval. This variant is part of the well-regarded Chromebook Plus line, earning positive attention from a trusted tech channel. Excellent screen and battery; firmware support keeps it dependable for years. Despite mixed coverage, the device remains a viable option in schools and personal use, as reflected by multiple outlets discussing its presence. Good balance of performance and battery, with a reputation for reliability in the Dell line. Over-hyped marketing; reports of inconsistent battery life and a flimsy chassis reduce long-term value. Google’s ongoing commitment to Chromebooks gives this model continued relevance and support, especially for school use. The device is still in use, indicating it meets the needs of some users even if not a top choice. The association with poor durability reports makes it a risky choice for long-term use.
What reviewers rate
  • Excellent battery life
  • Consistent firmware updates
  • Solid build quality
  • High-resolution screen
  • Strong performance
  • Premium convertible design
  • Premium build quality
  • Strong processor and graphics
  • Solid trackpad
  • Durable chassis
  • Comfortable keyboard
  • Good performance
  • Highly praised by a popular tech channel
  • Strong community endorsement
  • Recognized as the top convertible in the lineup
  • Similar build quality
  • Included in the respected Chromebook Plus series
  • Positive coverage by a popular tech video
  • Good performance
  • Affordable price
  • Excellent screen
  • Good battery
  • 1200p screen
  • Affordable
  • Recognized for its suitability in educational settings
  • Mentioned across several tech discussions
  • Affordable price
  • Solid display
  • Balanced performance
  • Reliable brand
  • Fast boot times
  • Good battery life
  • Good build quality
  • Decent battery life
  • Versatile design
  • Large bright display
  • Supported by Google’s enterprise strategy
  • Designed for educational environments
  • Reliability
  • Smooth hinge
  • Continues to be used by certain customers
  • Excellent display
  • Good trackpad
  • Long battery life
Nothing recorded
Where it falls short Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded
  • Inconsistent battery life
  • Flimsy chassis
  • Heavier than competitors
  • Marginally lower build quality
  • Limited durability
  • Short-term suitability
  • Potential quality and longevity issues
  • Lower spec
  • Weaker build
  • Underperformance on heavier workloads
Evidence behind it 32 sources across 28 outlets 24 sources across 22 outlets 40 sources across 31 outlets 12 sources across 10 outlets 7 sources across 7 outlets 19 sources across 18 outlets 16 sources across 16 outlets 4 sources across 4 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 3 sources across 3 outlets 13 sources across 9 outlets 5 sources across 4 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 3 of 6 research runs Not flagged 1 of 5 research runs 5 of 6 research runs
Announced Oct 2023 May 2024 Jun 2025 Sept 2025 Not recorded May 2024 Apr 2025 Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.