Best Bike Locks

Compare Bike Locks

15 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 21 Aug 2026

Pick any two to four of the 15 ranked bike locks and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Litelok X1, OnGuard RockSolid and OnGuard RockSolid 8590.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S
A
B
C
D
F
Bike Locks compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Litelok X1 Litelok Litelok X1 OnGuard RockSolid OnGuard OnGuard RockSolid OnGuard RockSolid 8590 OnGuard OnGuard RockSolid 8590 Abus Granit Super Extreme Abus Abus Granit Super Extreme Abus Bordo Granit Abus Abus Bordo Granit Abus Granit Super Extreme 2500 Abus Abus Granit Super Extreme 2500 Hiplok DX1000 Hiplok Hiplok DX1000 Kryptonite New York U-Lock Kryptonite Kryptonite New York U-Lock Litelok X3 Litelok Litelok X3 Kryptonite New York Diamond Kryptonite Kryptonite New York Diamond Seatylock Foldylock Forever Seatylock Seatylock Foldylock Forever OnGuard 8020 Mastiff OnGuard OnGuard 8020 Mastiff Kryptonite Evolution Mini-7 Kryptonite Kryptonite Evolution Mini-7 Hiplok DXF Hiplok Hiplok DXF Abus U-Grip Bordo Abus Abus U-Grip Bordo
Tier S A A B B B C C D D D D D D F
Rank on this board 1 of 15 2 of 15 3 of 15 4 of 15 5 of 15 6 of 15 7 of 15 8 of 15 9 of 15 10 of 15 11 of 15 12 of 15 13 of 15 14 of 15 15 of 15
Ladder points 896 LP 803 LP 745 LP 628 LP 551 LP 542 LP 426 LP 366 LP 335 LP 301 LP 257 LP 251 LP 247 LP 211 LP 177 LP
Our verdict Relative value proposition attractive despite not being the absolute top performer. Strongest U-lock against angle grinders, low weight and excellent value. Performance in the YouTube test demonstrates effectiveness against common attack methods. Consistently receives positive mentions and boasts a high-security rating, making it a top choice among users concerned about theft. Solid choice with good reputation, favorably appearing in testing and user recommendations. The Abus Granit Super Extreme 2500 fails to deliver on its high-end claim, offering vulnerability to cutting tools and lacking long-term reliability, which makes it a poor value proposition. YouTube testing highlights robust security features and resistance to force. Recognizable brand with decent protection, though not as highly praised as some competitors. The X3 offers a higher security rating than the X1 while maintaining a lightweight design. Its proven resistance to angle grinders and solid warranty give owners confidence in its long-term performance. This U-lock is praised for its high security rating and robust construction. While heavier, it provides reliable protection that holds up over many years of use, making it a solid pick for high-risk areas. Performance doesn’t justify the price for many users. The OnGuard 8020 Mastiff offers lower security due to a thinner shackle and higher failure rates, making it an inferior choice compared to newer models. Community discourages relying on this lock type due to inadequate protection. The DXF is praised for its best-value status, offering strong security at a lower price point. Its durable shackle and long warranty give owners confidence that the lock will hold up over many years of use. This lock is highlighted for its heavy-duty steel shackle and excellent resistance to cutting tools. Its long warranty and proven durability make it a dependable choice for riders who need maximum protection without excessive weight.
What reviewers rate
  • Good performance for its price
  • Value-oriented
  • High-security U-lock design
  • Hardened steel shackle
  • Best overall choice for angle-grinder resistance
  • Lightweight compared to other high-security U-locks
  • Exceptional value for the price
  • Top pick for grinder resistance
  • Strong resistance to attacks
  • Well-tested on video
  • Robust construction
  • High security rating
  • High-security Solid Secure Diamond rating
  • Durable construction
  • Trusted by regular users
  • Unmatched security for high-risk areas
  • Reputable brand
  • Reliable performance
  • Portable design
  • Solid steel shackle
  • Highest Sold Secure rating
  • Chain-style suitable for e-bikes
  • Reasonable price
  • Best lock for e-bikes according to Bicycling Magazine
  • Robust security
  • High level of protection
  • Lightweight
  • High security comparable to heavy U-locks
  • Brand recognition
  • Decent protection
  • Thick steel shackle
  • Reinforced body
  • Higher security rating
  • Lightweight design
  • Angle-grinder resistant
  • Solid warranty
  • High security rating
  • Robust construction
  • Long-term reliability
  • Gold-level Sold Secure rating
  • Exceptional build quality
  • Lightweight & portable
  • Heavy-duty chain
  • Balanced weight and protection
  • Suitable for e-bikes
  • Best chain lock overall
  • Affordable
  • Angle-grinder resistant
  • Compact size
  • Solid construction
  • Best value
  • Strong security
  • Durable shackle
  • Long warranty
  • Heavy-duty steel shackle
  • Resistance to cutting tools
  • Long warranty
  • Compact size
Where it falls short Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded
  • Vulnerable to angle grinders
  • Lacks long-term reliability
  • Higher price not justified
  • High cost relative to performance
  • Can be cut with a handheld angle grinder in under a minute
  • Lacks long-term durability
  • Extra weight
  • Higher cost with marginal security improvement
  • Premium price with minimal security gain
  • Overpriced relative to security
  • Heavy weight
  • No weather sealing
  • Thinner shackle
  • Higher failure rates in lab tests
  • Marginal security gains compared to lighter U-locks
  • Higher price point than comparable options
  • Inadequate protection
  • Easily defeated
  • Weak against angle grinders and other power tools
  • Not suitable for high-risk theft zones
  • Security below that of the Hiplok DX1000
  • Not as strong against high-risk theft scenarios
  • Can be defeated by an angle grinder quickly
  • Lower long-term security
  • Heavy weight
  • Can be cut with a high-power angle grinder after prolonged use
  • Not the most cost-effective
  • Easily broken by simple tools
Evidence behind it 46 sources across 35 outlets 15 sources across 12 outlets 3 sources across 2 outlets 3 sources across 3 outlets 6 sources across 6 outlets 9 sources across 7 outlets 16 sources across 13 outlets 5 sources across 5 outlets 32 sources across 22 outlets 11 sources across 7 outlets 9 sources across 7 outlets 2 sources across 2 outlets 2 sources across 2 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 5 research runs 1 of 6 research runs 1 of 7 research runs 1 of 2 research runs 1 of 2 research runs 2 of 3 research runs 2 of 6 research runs 4 of 7 research runs 3 of 6 research runs 2 of 6 research runs
Announced Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.