Synology

Synology DS223j

F
Ranked #21 in NAS Devices
89 LP on the category ladder what's LP?

The cheapest Synology, and it shows: slow UI, poor multi-connection handling, and weak hardware under a good operating system. Buy the DS225+ or the Drivestor 4 Gen2 instead.

Consolidated from 3 independent outlets

Where the cited sources landed, as we read them

  • 1 positive source
See the sources
Flagged as a product to avoid

2 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.

It is the cheapest door into Synology's ecosystem and gets cross-shopped on brand alone, but the hardware is the weakest here; the DS225+ or the Asustor Drivestor 4 Gen2 deliver far more for the money.

Flagged 23 September 2026
  1. It is the cheapest door into Synology's ecosystem and gets cross-shopped on brand alone, but the hardware is the weakest here; the DS225+ or the Asustor Drivestor 4 Gen2 deliver far more for the money.

    Flagged 23 September 2026
  2. The owner record is rough: an extremely slow UI, poor handling of simultaneous connections, and idle disk-activity complaints documented by its own owners. Great software bolted to the weakest hardware on the board; buy the Drivestor 4 Gen2 or step up to the DS224+.

    Flagged 23 September 2026

Why the boards include products to avoid

Check price

Pros & cons

  • โœ“ Runs Synology's well-regarded DSM software with a strong update cadence
  • โœ“ Rated 8 out of 10 by Vivid Repairs for software quality and security update cadence
  • โœ“ Breadth of DSM features
  • โœ“ Good enough for basic backup duty per community users
  • โœ“ Btrfs support now added over its predecessor
  • โœ— Extremely slow UI reported by users
  • โœ— Does not handle simultaneous connections well
  • โœ— Limited to ext4
  • โœ— Constant disk activity reported even when nothing is active
  • โœ— Hardware is weak; the review score is credited almost entirely to software, not hardware

The sources behind this ranking

We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found. 1 outlet wouldn't let us check its link.

Evidence 1 article, 1 video review and 1 community source

Frequently asked questions

It ranks #21 of 22 on our NAS devices tier list, in F tier. That placement draws on 3 independent outlets.

Extremely slow UI reported by users. Does not handle simultaneous connections well. Limited to ext4. Constant disk activity reported even when nothing is active. Hardware is weak; the review score is credited almost entirely to software, not hardware.

Ranked nearby in NAS Devices