QNAP

QNAP TS-464

F
Ranked #19 in NAS Devices
175 LP on the category ladder what's LP?

QNAP's own positioning is a "compact 4-bay NAS with superior performance," supporting up to 72 TB storage and 4 TB M.2 SSD caching, and the hardware genuinely is the most expandable in this class with PCIe and multi-gigabit networking. It ranks mid-board because QNAP's software and security history is the weak link: community consensus is that "QNAP has better hardware, but their software is horrible to the point that a synology with half the specs runs faster." Buy it for the hardware, and stay on top of firmware.

Consolidated from 3 cited sources across 2 outlets

Where the cited sources landed, as we read them

  • 2 enthusiastic sources
  • 1 mixed source
See the sources
Flagged as a product to avoid

5 of 10 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.

Its awards are from 2023 and its marketing still leads with them, but Wirecutter's current guide no longer picks it, crowning the Synology DiskStation DS225+ instead, and current guides route 4-bay buyers to the TerraMaster F4-424 Pro.

Flagged 23 September 2026
  1. Its awards are from 2023 and its marketing still leads with them, but Wirecutter's current guide no longer picks it, crowning the Synology DiskStation DS225+ instead, and current guides route 4-bay buyers to the TerraMaster F4-424 Pro.

    Flagged 23 September 2026
  2. Brilliant hardware is undermined by software that owners describe as slower and worse than Synology's on half the specs, making it a poor long-term ownership choice.

    Flagged 23 September 2026
  3. Coasting on a stale 2023 Wirecutter award that QNAP's own product page still leads with, while Wirecutter's current guide crowns the Synology DS225+ instead. The current generation of 4-bays from TerraMaster outclasses it.

    Flagged 23 September 2026
  4. A former mainstream 4-bay recommendation coasting on old reviews while newer rivals pass it on hardware; current roundups point buyers toward newer 4-bay units that deliver more performance for the same role.

    Flagged 23 September 2026
  5. The hardware is genuinely strong, but the specialist community's verdict is consistent that QNAP's software is so poor that a Synology with half the specs runs faster. Cross-shopped against every four-bay Synology on hardware alone.

    Flagged 23 September 2026

Why the boards include products to avoid

Check price

Pros & cons

  • โœ“ Compact 4-bay design with up to 72 TB capacity
  • โœ“ PCIe slots enable SSD caching for performance boost
  • โœ“ Multi-gigabit networking provides fast connectivity
  • โœ“ Highly expandable hardware
  • โœ“ Strong hardware with PCIe expansion and 2.5 GbE
  • โœ— Software and security reputation considered weak
  • โœ— Requires active firmware management
  • โœ— Aging design, newer rivals have narrowed the value gap
  • โœ— Marketing still leans on awards from 2023
  • โœ— No longer picked by Wirecutter's current guide

The sources behind this ranking

We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found.

Frequently asked questions

It ranks #19 of 22 on our NAS devices tier list, in F tier. That placement draws on 3 cited sources across 2 outlets.

None of the 3 sources with a clear view is critical of it. Software and security reputation considered weak. Requires active firmware management. Aging design, newer rivals have narrowed the value gap. Marketing still leans on awards from 2023. No longer picked by Wirecutter's current guide.

Ranked nearby in NAS Devices