Polaroid Hi-Print Generation 2
RTINGS' compact pick with a minimal mechanism, ranked last among picks for media lock-in and modest output.
Consolidated from 2 independent outlets
See the sources4 of 11 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.
Uses ZINK technology that delivers visibly lower quality than Instax Mini Link 3, so convenience cannot compensate for the quality gap.
Flagged 17 October 2026
Pros & cons
- ✓ Current best compact photo printer per RTINGS
- ✓ Minimal mechanism
- ✓ Mature ZINK consumable chain
- ✓ Solid engineering behind it
- ✓ Mechanically simple design ensures reliability
- ✗ Media lock-in
- ✗ Modest output quality
- ✗ ZINK output quality is visibly below competing instant printers
- ✗ Small print format limits usefulness
- ✗ Consumables locked to proprietary supply
The sources behind this ranking
We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found.
Frequently asked questions
It ranks #16 of 16 on our photo printers tier list, in F tier. That placement draws on 2 independent outlets.
Media lock-in. Modest output quality. ZINK output quality is visibly below competing instant printers. Small print format limits usefulness. Consumables locked to proprietary supply.
Ranked nearby in Photo Printers
S tier #1 Epson SureColor P700
S tier #2 Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-310
A tier #3 Canon PIXMA PRO-200S
A tier #4 1 of 16 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Epson Expression Photo XP-8800
B tier #5 Canon PIXMA G620
D tier #11 5 of 19 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Canon SELPHY CP1500
D tier #12 3 of 8 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850
F tier #13 3 of 5 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Canon PIXMA TR160
F tier #14 6 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. HP Sprocket Studio Plus
F tier #15 9 of 11 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.