Compare Tents

Pick any two to four of the 17 ranked tents and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Big Agnes Copper Spur UL3, Mountain Hardwear Mineral King 3 and Kelty Wireless 6.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S

Big Agnes Copper Spur UL3 Mountain Hardwear Mineral King 3

A

Kelty Wireless 6 North Face Wawona 6

C

Hilleberg Allak NEMO Aurora Highrise 4P Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL1

D

NEMO Aurora Highrise 6P Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL2 Fjern Gökotta 2 Big Agnes Copper Spur UL1 Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL3

F

Big Agnes Copper Spur UL2 Coleman Skydome 6P Big Agnes Sting Simond MT900 Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL

Tents compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.

Measure	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur UL3	Mountain Hardwear Mountain Hardwear Mineral King 3	Kelty Kelty Wireless 6	North Face North Face Wawona 6	Hilleberg Hilleberg Allak	NEMO NEMO Aurora Highrise 4P	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL1	NEMO NEMO Aurora Highrise 6P	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL2	Fjern Fjern Gökotta 2	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur UL1	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL3	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur UL2	Coleman Coleman Skydome 6P	Big Agnes Big Agnes Sting	Simond Simond MT900	Big Agnes Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL
Tier	S	S	A	A	C	C	C	D	D	D	D	D	F	F	F	F	F
Rank on this board	1 of 17	2 of 17	3 of 17	4 of 17	5 of 17	6 of 17	7 of 17	8 of 17	9 of 17	10 of 17	11 of 17	12 of 17	13 of 17	14 of 17	15 of 17	16 of 17	17 of 17
Ladder points	1098 LP	1031 LP	811 LP	657 LP	473 LP	440 LP	362 LP	321 LP	306 LP	303 LP	295 LP	295 LP	137 LP	0 LP	0 LP	0 LP	0 LP
Our verdict	The most versatile three-person ultralight, praised for its lightweight, packability and long-term durability.	The top two-person tent for backcountry, noted for its low weight and excellent weather protection.	Best value family-camping tent, combining roomy floor space with solid weatherproofing.	Best overall family-camping tent, offering the largest floor area (86 sq ft) and robust construction.	Excellent weather protection for two people, but its higher price and limited space keep it below the top tier.	A four-person tent that balances weight and weather protection.	The lightest three-person tent with a fully pitched attachment system that keeps it dry in harsh weather.	The six-person version offers more space but suffers from higher weight and a less robust frame.	A higher-volume version of the UL3 that adds headroom without much weight penalty.	Switchback Travel lists the Fjern Gökotta 2 as a standout for its compact size, durability and good ventilation.	Premium price for too small interior space.	The flagship three-person model that offers the best combination of weight, space and durability.	A two-person ultralight that offers excellent comfort and durability.	Although marketed as a budget family tent, reviews point to frequent seam failures and limited wind resistance after long use.	Overpriced for its limited weather performance.	A high-price, heavy tent that repeatedly receives complaints about weak pole connections and seam integrity in extreme weather.	Over-priced with only marginal additional space.
What reviewers rate	Lightweight design that keeps you dry through the worst storms Excellent packability for backpackers Long-term durability proven by RTINGS Lightweight and compact pack size	Low weight for two-person use Excellent weather protection Wirecutter’s best two-person tent Roomy interior for two people	Roomy floor space for families Solid weatherproofing Wirecutter’s best for most users Easy to set up	Largest floor area among family tents Robust construction for weather resistance Wirecutter’s best for family camping Spacious floor area for families	Exceptional weather protection Compact for two people Storm-proof with excellent wind resistance High performance	Excellent wind resistance per RTINGS Spaciousness for families Wirecutter highlights family use High-rise design gives extra headroom	Lightest 3-person ultralight Fully pitched attachment system for dryness Long-term performance per RTINGS Single-person use	More interior space Spaciousness for families Durable construction High-rise design	Extra headroom compared to UL3 Comfort and durability per RTINGS Top pick for backpackers needing extra space High volume for two people	Compact Durable Good ventilation ideal for pitching on snow	Lightweight Solid choice for solo or two-person trips best one-person tent for backpacking Very light and compact for solo use	Most reliable in its class per RTINGS Excellent balance of weight, space and durability Top pick for backpackers needing extra room High interior volume	Comfortable design per RTINGS Long-term reliability Top pick for backpackers needing extra headroom Ultralight weight	Budget price for families Easy setup Large floor area Solid performance for the price	Lightweight Spacious vestibule Easy set-up Good value	High-end design High performance Lightweight Robust construction	Spaciousness High-volume interior Ultra-light weight Excellent weather protection
Where it falls short	Nothing recorded	Nothing recorded	Nothing recorded	seam failures reported after a year of use Higher weight Less weather resistance compared to similar tents Heavier than comparable options	Nothing recorded	Small vestibule Limited headroom	Limited capacity Less durable than comparable models	Heavy weight Seam failures after long use price does not match the extra space better to buy a 4-person model or different brand	Higher price and weight not justified Prone to damage when wet Less reliable in heavy rain	Limited ventilation Poor rain-proofing	Small interior space Premium pricing	Higher price for similar weight and pack size Heavier than flagship Higher cost with minimal added benefits	Heavier and less compact than UL3 Fragile nylon Lower durability than comparable models	Seam failures over time Limited wind resistance Heavy weight Limited weather protection for its size	Limited weather protection Higher price compared to similar models Heavy weight Limited interior volume	Weak pole connections Seam integrity problems Heavy weight Fragile frame	High price for limited extra room higher failure rate in wind poles less durable Heavier than newer models
Evidence behind it	10 sources across 8 outlets	3 sources across 3 outlets	10 sources across 8 outlets	20 sources across 19 outlets	22 sources across 19 outlets	3 sources across 3 outlets	10 sources across 10 outlets	3 sources across 3 outlets	31 sources across 27 outlets	2 sources across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	8 sources across 7 outlets	11 sources across 10 outlets	27 sources across 23 outlets	2 sources across 2 outlets	1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	25 sources across 20 outlets	6 sources across 6 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	2 of 12 research runs	2 of 12 research runs	1 of 6 research runs	1 of 2 research runs	2 of 8 research runs	2 of 8 research runs	1 of 7 research runs	1 of 7 research runs	2 of 10 research runs	2 of 7 research runs	8 of 12 research runs	5 of 9 research runs	4 of 7 research runs	4 of 6 research runs
Announced	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded
Where to buy	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record	No link on record

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.