Best Hiking Boots

Compare Hiking Boots

12 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 21 Aug 2026

Pick any two to four of the 12 ranked hiking boots and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX, Salomon Quest 5 and La Sportiva TX Hike GTX.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S
A
B
C
D
F
Hiking Boots compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX Salomon Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX Salomon Quest 5 Salomon Salomon Quest 5 La Sportiva TX Hike GTX La Sportiva La Sportiva TX Hike GTX Salomon Quest Gore-Tex Salomon Salomon Quest Gore-Tex Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX Merrell Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX Merrell Moab 3 Mid Waterproof Merrell Merrell Moab 3 Mid Waterproof Scarpa Terra GTX Scarpa Scarpa Terra GTX Altra Lone Peak 9 Altra Altra Lone Peak 9 Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 Altra Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 Hanwag Blueridge ES Hanwag Hanwag Blueridge ES Merrell Moab 3 Merrell Merrell Moab 3 Redwing Boots Redwing Redwing Boots
Tier S S S A A B B C C D D F
Rank on this board 1 of 12 2 of 12 3 of 12 4 of 12 5 of 12 6 of 12 7 of 12 8 of 12 9 of 12 10 of 12 11 of 12 12 of 12
Ladder points 951 LP 874 LP 873 LP 702 LP 661 LP 619 LP 590 LP 490 LP 362 LP 329 LP 260 LP 0 LP
Our verdict Its recognition as “Best Lightweight” demonstrates a strong combination of performance and portability, making it a popular choice. Being featured in a top boot list suggests consistent positive experiences and solid performance across various conditions. Technical design offers great grip; build quality holds up over years. Proven durability and support over many seasons; excellent warranty and brand reputation. The "Best Budget" designation indicates excellent value for those seeking reliable hiking boots without breaking the bank. Reliable waterproofing and proven longevity in harsh conditions. Heavy-weight construction gives long life, though heavier than some peers. Ultra-light design and supportive fit make it the best choice for long, light-pack hikes at a competitive price. Ultralight and comfortable; durability acceptable for moderate use but not extreme multi-day hikes. Very durable and supportive, but heavier and less breathable than others. Reliable, affordable, and widely praised; still a top pick for budget hikers. While some reviewers praise their style, they lack the robust construction and waterproofing needed for backpacking; BetterTrail lists them only in a “best walking boots” guide, not hiking.
What reviewers rate
  • Lightweight design
  • Good traction on varied terrain
  • King of hiking boots for protection and comfort
  • Stable ankle support
  • Sturdy build
  • Good ankle support
  • Best overall backpacking boot for weight-to-support ratio
  • GORE-TEX locking laces
  • Sticky grip on technical terrain
  • Waterproof performance
  • Lightweight construction
  • Comfortable fit for women
  • Solid traction
  • Excellent ankle support
  • Comfortable fit across foot shapes
  • Durable construction
  • Affordable price point
  • Durable construction
  • Entry-level price
  • Waterproof protection
  • Durable construction
  • Waterproof protection
  • Comfortable fit
  • Good traction on wet surfaces
  • Versatile design
  • High quality materials
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent waterproofing
  • Ultralight construction
  • Supportive fit
  • Comfortable for extended wear
  • Ventilated design
  • Best ultralight option
  • Agile design
  • Stable platform
  • Comfortable fit
  • Heaviest tested boot
  • Comfortable fit
  • Sensual suede upper
  • Durable construction
  • Affordable price
  • Comfortable fit
  • Durability
  • Lower cost
  • Rugged
Where it falls short Nothing recorded
  • Higher failure rate over time
  • No Gore-Tex waterproofing
  • Moderate ankle protection
Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded Nothing recorded
  • Outdated design
  • Less durable than newer models
Nothing recorded
  • Heaviest among tested boots
  • Heavier than many peers
Nothing recorded
  • Lack of robust construction
  • Insufficient waterproofing
  • High price for limited performance
  • Thin construction
Evidence behind it 12 sources across 10 outlets 26 sources across 19 outlets 5 sources across 5 outlets 4 sources across 4 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 2 sources across 2 outlets 11 sources across 10 outlets 53 sources across 44 outlets 7 sources across 5 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 44 sources across 36 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged 1 of 10 research runs Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 5 research runs Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 5 of 6 research runs
Announced Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.