Compare Electric Toothbrushes

20 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 13 Sept 2026

Pick any two to four of the 20 ranked electric toothbrushes and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Oral-B Pro 1000, Philips Sonicare 4100 and Oral-B iO Series 5.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

Electric Toothbrushes compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure	Oral-B Oral-B Pro 1000	Philips Philips Sonicare 4100	Oral-B Oral-B iO Series 5	Suri Suri 2.0 Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush	Oral-B Oral-B iO Series 3	Oral-B Oral-B iO Series 9	Oral-B Oral-B iO Series 2	Philips Philips Sonicare 7100	usmile usmile Y10 Pro	Laifen Laifen Wave	Philips Philips Sonicare 9900 Prestige	Philips Philips Sonicare ProtectiveClean 5300	Oral-B Oral-B Genius X	Oral-B Oral-B iO Series 7	Philips Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500	Aquasonic Aquasonic Black Series	Bitvae Bitvae R2	Burst Burst Sonic Toothbrush	Foreo Foreo Issa 3	Quip Quip Ultra Smart Sonic Electric Toothbrush
Tier	S	A	A	A	B	B	B	B	C	C	D	D	D	D	D	F	F	F	F	F
Rank on this board	1 of 20	2 of 20	3 of 20	4 of 20	5 of 20	6 of 20	7 of 20	8 of 20	9 of 20	10 of 20	11 of 20	12 of 20	13 of 20	14 of 20	15 of 20	16 of 20	17 of 20	18 of 20	19 of 20	20 of 20
Ladder points	891 LP	780 LP	689 LP	647 LP	583 LP	568 LP	531 LP	516 LP	412 LP	362 LP	343 LP	318 LP	282 LP	259 LP	253 LP	200 LP	157 LP	149 LP	118 LP	0 LP
Our verdict	The minimalist brush earns the title of best overall by Wirecutter and CNET, praised for its reliable cleaning and ease of use.	Wirecutter, TechRadar and ElectricTeeth all praise it as the best Sonicare for everyday use, featuring a pressure sensor and two intensity settings.	CNET and ElectricTeeth highlight it as a mid-tier iO model that balances price with the same smart features as the Series 3.	ElectricTeeth and Health.com rank it among the top three brushes for its quiet operation, silicone bristles and automatic brushing.	ElectricTeeth and CNET list it as the flagship iO model that delivers excellent cleaning with a smart display and pressure sensor.	CNET and ElectricTeeth praise it as the flagship iO model that adds a larger battery, more modes and a larger display than the Series 7.	ElectricTeeth and Health.com mention that it is a very early iO model that lacks the pressure sensor and smart display of later iO brushes, so it is outclassed by the Series 3 and 5.	Wired and TechRadar name it a high-end Sonicare that offers a pressure sensor, multiple modes and a long battery life.	Smart-screen feedback at budget-brand pricing. Real value, dinged for weaker support network and unproven durability.	Excellent hardware value from a brand whose five-year support story is unwritten. That uncertainty is what holds it back.	Wired and TechRadar note that its premium price is justified only by a few extra modes and a higher-end design. The same cleaning performance is available in the 7100 for far less.	Wired and TechRadar point out that its 2-minute timer and single intensity mode make it less versatile than the 4100, and its price is higher than the 4300.	Wirecutter and CNET call it the best high-tech brush, with AI-guided brushing and a smart display.	ElectricTeeth and Health.com note it as the next-step iO model with a larger battery and more modes than the Series 5.	Wired and TechRadar list it as the best electric toothbrush for healthier teeth and gums, with a premium design and smart features.	While it provides a powerful sonic head and long battery life, the Aquasonic Black Series falls behind the iO and Sonicare 9900 in cleaning performance and modern features.	The tier most associated with dead-on-arrival batteries and cracked handles, with no long-term test record and no proven support channel. The Pro 1000 costs little more and is the antidote.	Burst’s sonic toothbrush delivers 40,000 vibrations per minute, a long battery life, and a minimalist design, making it a strong mid-range option that balances performance and price.	Trap, and the clearest one on the board: near-flagship pricing with plaque removal that independent testing puts behind conventional sonic brushes. Buy the Suri 2.0 if design matters, the iO 5 if cleaning does.	Marketing and subscription economics dressed as a toothbrush. Underpowered versus every pick above it and dependent on Quip's refill pipeline.
What reviewers rate	Minimalist design Highly-rated performance Trusted by major reviewers Basic brushing functionality	Pressure sensor Two intensity settings Strong reviewer support Good sonic cleaning performance	Smart features Mid-tier pricing Consistent performance AI-guided pressure sensor for optimal brushing	Quiet operation Silicone bristles Automatic brushing Sonic brush head for efficient cleaning	Smart display Pressure sensor Flagship performance iO magnetic drive is quieter and smoother than the old oscillating mechanism	Largest battery More modes Large display Dual-motion cleaning for thorough plaque removal	Forbes Vetted's best electric toothbrush overall Health.com recommends it for gentle brushing with overbrushing protection Cheapest way into the iO motor Simple feature set is good for longevity	Pressure sensor Multiple modes Long battery life TechRadar's current headline pick for best electric toothbrush	Screen and brushing-coverage feedback at a fraction of big-brand smart brush prices Genuinely competitive cleaning performance Budget smart-brush value disruptor	Combines oscillation plus vibration Strong battery life Premium-feeling build at a mid-range price	High-frequency sonic vibration for deep cleaning Smart app integration for habit tracking Premium build quality Brushes perfectly well - nothing is wrong with the cleaning itself	Electric Teeth's 'Best Philips' pick Ranked #3 on Pik Tech's 2026 list Same two-source support pattern as the iO3	AI-guided brushing Smart display High-tech design Oscillating-rotating technology for thorough cleaning	Larger battery More modes Progressive iO design Larger display for easier navigation	Premium design Smart features Health-focused performance Mature, well-understood platform with a long service history	Powerful sonic head for effective cleaning Long battery life for extended use Ranked #5 on Pik Tech's 2026 list	Very low price with impressive spec-sheet numbers	40,000 vibrations per minute for effective cleaning Long battery life for extended use Minimalist design for easy handling A real product people genuinely cross-shop	Nothing recorded	Sleek design
Where it falls short	No pressure sensor No smart coaching Limited features for its price Only basic features - a single cleaning mode	Lacks high-frequency vibration No app integration Replacement heads are more expensive than Oral-B's	Value gap over the iO Series 3 is thin iO consumable costs remain high	Weaker motor: 33,000 BPM versus rivals up to 62,000, so it feels less powerful Shorter track record than the big-two platforms	iO replacement heads are meaningfully more expensive than classic Oral-B heads Younger platform than the Pro line, so less long-term data	Color display, app dependency and magnetic charging case mean simply more to break Priciest consumables in the category Maximizes both failure surface and lifetime ownership cost	No pressure sensor No smart display Outclassed by newer models iO replacement heads carry a real multi-year cost premium	Sonicare refill heads cost more than Oral-B's classic heads	Weaker brand support network Unproven durability Build quality is a compromise	Young brand: warranty support depth is unproven Brush-head availability in five years is uncertain No long-term failure data yet	Premium price for few extra modes Higher-end design not matched by performance Costs roughly three to four times a Sonicare 4100 Adds SenseIQ gimmickry and a leatherette travel case	Single intensity mode Limited timer Higher price than 4300 Ranked just below the iO3 because Electric Teeth positions the iO3's brand slot higher in its own ordering of winners	Superseded platform thoroughly outclassed by the iO line's quieter magnetic motor Still sits on shelves at premium, near-iO pricing You pay iO-adjacent money for the older, harsher drive system App connectivity that nobody keeps using	The supporting video has only 19 views and 1 like - barely a pulse Included for completeness; support is minimal	Aging flagship now matched by newer mid-range models for less money	Limited smart features Outclassed in plaque removal by newer models Listed rather than advocated, even by the outlets that name it Not on the canonical list; named as the source named it	Ultra-budget tier dominates negative review threads for dead batteries on arrival, bristles falling into the mouth and cracked handles No meaningful long-term test data on this brand Warranty support and head availability years from now are unknowns Cross-shops against the Pro 1000 and 4100 purely on price, where ownership goes wrong	Subscription-marketed influencer favorite with no major testing outlet elevating it Dentist-facing reviewers flag its aggressive marketing claims as outrunning cleaning performance The Sonicare 4100 is a better buy for less money	Nothing recorded	Brushing performance has never matched Oral-B or Sonicare Ownership model locks you into a refill ecosystem whose economics favor Quip Independent testing consistently places its cleaning behind equivalently priced big-two handles The cheaper Oral-B Pro 1000 cleans better with heads sold everywhere
Evidence behind it	21 sources across 18 outlets	33 sources across 26 outlets	12 sources across 10 outlets	2 sources across 2 outlets	9 sources across 9 outlets	19 sources across 16 outlets	10 sources across 10 outlets	12 sources across 9 outlets	12 sources across 12 outlets	49 sources across 35 outlets	31 sources across 25 outlets	41 sources across 35 outlets	25 sources across 23 outlets	13 sources across 11 outlets	17 sources across 14 outlets	32 sources across 31 outlets	15 sources across 15 outlets	18 sources across 17 outlets	6 sources across 6 outlets	3 sources across 3 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid	1 of 10 research runs	1 of 10 research runs	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	1 of 10 research runs	1 of 9 research runs	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	4 of 9 research runs	1 of 2 research runs	2 of 9 research runs	Not flagged	1 of 8 research runs	1 of 2 research runs	1 of 3 research runs	1 of 6 research runs	Not flagged	3 of 7 research runs
Announced	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Mar 2026	Not recorded	Not recorded	Jul 2026	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded
Where to buy	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.