Best Dehumidifiers

Compare Dehumidifiers

17 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 13 Sept 2026

Pick any two to four of the 17 ranked dehumidifiers and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Midea Cube 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier, GE APYR50LC and Frigidaire FFAD5033W1.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S
A
B
C
D
F
Dehumidifiers compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Midea Cube 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier Midea Midea Cube 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier GE APYR50LC GE GE APYR50LC Frigidaire FFAD5033W1 Frigidaire Frigidaire FFAD5033W1 Frigidaire FHDD5034W1 Frigidaire Frigidaire FHDD5034W1 Frigidaire Gallery FGAC5045W1 Frigidaire Frigidaire Gallery FGAC5045W1 Midea Cube 20-Pint Smart Dehumidifier Midea Midea Cube 20-Pint Smart Dehumidifier GoveeLife Smart Dehumidifier H7151 GoveeLife GoveeLife Smart Dehumidifier H7151 GE APEL50LZ GE GE APEL50LZ DREO Dehumidifier 733S DREO DREO Dehumidifier 733S Honeywell TP50AWKNR Honeywell Honeywell TP50AWKNR Midea Cube 20-Pint Dehumidifier Midea Midea Cube 20-Pint Dehumidifier Hisense DH7021K1W Hisense Hisense DH7021K1W hOmeLabs 50-Pint Energy Star Dehumidifier hOmeLabs hOmeLabs 50-Pint Energy Star Dehumidifier Ivation 13-Pint Desiccant Dehumidifier Ivation Ivation 13-Pint Desiccant Dehumidifier TCL 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier (H50D44W) TCL TCL 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier (H50D44W) Eva-Dry E-333 Renewable Mini Dehumidifier Eva-Dry Eva-Dry E-333 Renewable Mini Dehumidifier Pro Breeze Electric Mini Dehumidifier Pro Breeze Pro Breeze Electric Mini Dehumidifier
Tier S A A A B B B B C C D D D D F F F
Rank on this board 1 of 17 2 of 17 3 of 17 4 of 17 5 of 17 6 of 17 7 of 17 8 of 17 9 of 17 10 of 17 11 of 17 12 of 17 13 of 17 14 of 17 15 of 17 16 of 17 17 of 17
Ladder points 1041 LP 818 LP 804 LP 655 LP 575 LP 520 LP 516 LP 502 LP 482 LP 432 LP 359 LP 335 LP 244 LP 232 LP 176 LP 0 LP 0 LP
Our verdict Best overall unit for its size, quietest dehumidifier tested, reliable bucket-less mode and easy-to-use app Largest capacity with a built-in pump and lowest energy use per pint Honestly still a capable machine when it works, which earns it a spot above several picks' lower ranks, but it is a superseded design coasting on an old Wirecutter crown, and aged stock plus its failure history make the FHDD5034W1 the correct purchase. Quiet operation and reliable performance in larger rooms Excellent performance with a sleek design Best compact dehumidifier for small spaces, low-maintenance, smart-controlled Good value but app issues and higher noise level than comparable units The pump-equipped sibling of the top-ranked GE. Same ownership strengths, slightly less outlet validation for this exact model. Promising and pleasant to use, but multi-year reliability is unproven and DREO has no meaningful compressor-appliance track record yet. Reliable, energy-efficient, easy to use but pricier than some competitors The right buy for small rooms, inheriting the Cube platform's strengths. Ranked lower only because it serves a narrower use case, not because it is worse. Simple touch controls and solid performance in large rooms Review-volume marketing disguising middling real-world performance and weak warranty support. The Midea Cube outclasses it at the same money. Wrong technology for most buyers. Desiccant units serve cold-space niches, and anyone shopping a normal room should buy a compressor unit. Large capacity and pump-enabled design, solid performance in very humid spaces Not a room dehumidifier at all in any meaningful sense. Fine for a safe or closet, a waste of money against actual damp. A Peltier unit with negligible extraction. The worst way to spend money in this category if you have a real moisture problem, regardless of how prominently Amazon promotes it.
What reviewers rate
  • Quiet operation
  • Reliable bucket-less mode
  • User-friendly app
  • Consistently removes the most moisture per hour
  • Largest 50-pint capacity
  • Built-in condensate pump
  • Excellent airflow
  • Lowest energy use per pint among 50-pint class
  • Still a capable machine when it works
  • Spent years as Wirecutter's top pick
  • Quiet operation
  • Reliable performance
  • Large capacity
  • High dehumidification rate
  • Built-in pump
  • Sleek design
  • Consistently high performance and reliability
  • Gallery-line smart 50-pint unit with Wi-Fi and a washable filter
  • Compact size
  • Wi-Fi enabled
  • Low maintenance
  • Good performance in small rooms
  • Budget-friendly
  • Wi-Fi control
  • Decent performance
  • Value
  • 50-pint model with built-in pump for flexible drainage
  • Shares the same platform and service network as the RTINGS-topping APYR50LC
  • Backed by GE's strong parts availability
  • Good specs and quiet operation
  • Positive reviews and pleasant to use
  • Reliable performance
  • High capacity
  • Energy efficient
  • Easy to use
  • Right-sized for bedrooms and small rooms where a 50-pint is overkill
  • Shares the design language and engineering of Wirecutter's top-pick Cube platform
  • Lower compressor duty cycle in right-sized rooms is a longevity plus
  • Simple touch controls
  • Solid performance
  • Large room capacity
  • Familiar brand name
  • Energy Star certified
  • Enormous review base provides abundant owner feedback
  • Desiccant design genuinely suits cold spaces where compressor units struggle
  • Large capacity
  • Pump-enabled design
  • Solid performance in humid spaces
  • Good Housekeeping's pick for large basements
  • Legitimate product for a gun safe or closet
  • Simple renewable silica-gel desiccant design with no compressor
  • Low budget price point
  • Compact, compressor-free thermoelectric design
Where it falls short
  • GE's deeper service and support network is the better long-term bet
Nothing recorded
  • Previous-generation design, superseded by the FHDD/FFAD3-series successors
  • Well-documented history of coil and sensor failures in owner reports
  • Buying it today means aged stock, often at no discount over the current model
Nothing recorded
  • Costs more than the FHDD5034W1 without a clear durability gain
  • Does nothing exceptional
Nothing recorded
  • App buggy
  • Higher noise level
  • Actual moisture-removal rate lower than other 50-pint units
  • Noticeably louder
  • Slightly behind the APYR50LC on tested performance per the outlets
  • Unproven multi-year reliability
  • No meaningful compressor-appliance track record yet
  • Pricier
  • Serves a narrower use case than full-size 50-pint units
  • Hisense was swept up in the industry-wide recalls of Midea-built dehumidifiers
  • Appears in none of the current expert roundups
  • The hOmeLabs 50-pint offers tested backing for the same money
  • Independent hands-on testing finds its real-world extraction and humidity control lag Midea, GE and Frigidaire units
  • Owner reviews show an elevated rate of early compressor deaths
  • Slow warranty response
  • Review count is a function of aggressive listing optimization, not engineering
  • Wrong tool for typical rooms above about 10 degrees C
  • Only 13 pints of capacity at a price similar to 50-pint compressor units
  • Rotary desiccant machines are "really, really uncommon" in the US
  • Thinner service network than GE or Frigidaire
  • Capacity is measured in ounces, not pints
  • Simply cannot deliver room-level moisture control
  • Marketed alongside real dehumidifiers, so buyers routinely purchase it expecting room performance
  • Peltier unit that extracts only a fraction of a pint per day
  • Effectively useless against genuine damp
  • UK reviewers testing budget minis consistently find only compressor models worth buying
  • Dominates small-dehumidifier search results despite negligible performance
Evidence behind it 17 sources across 16 outlets 8 sources across 8 outlets 6 sources across 5 outlets 4 sources across 4 outlets 5 sources across 5 outlets 3 sources across 3 outlets 6 sources across 6 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 7 sources across 6 outlets 3 sources across 3 outlets 19 sources across 18 outlets 4 sources across 4 outlets 11 sources across 11 outlets 4 sources across 4 outlets 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional 13 sources across 12 outlets 4 sources across 4 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 8 research runs Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 10 research runs Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 7 research runs 1 of 9 research runs 1 of 4 research runs 2 of 9 research runs 3 of 8 research runs 3 of 8 research runs
Announced Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.