Compare Dehumidifiers
17 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 13 Sept 2026
Pick any two to four of the 17 ranked dehumidifiers and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Midea Cube 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier, GE APYR50LC and Frigidaire FFAD5033W1.
Choose what to compare
3 of 4 chosen
S
A
B
C
D
F
| Measure | Midea Midea Cube 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier | GE GE APYR50LC | Frigidaire Frigidaire FFAD5033W1 | Frigidaire Frigidaire FHDD5034W1 | Frigidaire Frigidaire Gallery FGAC5045W1 | Midea Midea Cube 20-Pint Smart Dehumidifier | GoveeLife GoveeLife Smart Dehumidifier H7151 | GE GE APEL50LZ | DREO DREO Dehumidifier 733S | Honeywell Honeywell TP50AWKNR | Midea Midea Cube 20-Pint Dehumidifier | Hisense Hisense DH7021K1W | hOmeLabs hOmeLabs 50-Pint Energy Star Dehumidifier | Ivation Ivation 13-Pint Desiccant Dehumidifier | TCL TCL 50-Pint Smart Dehumidifier (H50D44W) | Eva-Dry Eva-Dry E-333 Renewable Mini Dehumidifier | Pro Breeze Pro Breeze Electric Mini Dehumidifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | A | A | A | B | B | B | B | C | C | D | D | D | D | F | F | F |
| Rank on this board | 1 of 17 | 2 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 7 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 17 of 17 |
| Ladder points | 1041 LP | 818 LP | 804 LP | 655 LP | 575 LP | 520 LP | 516 LP | 502 LP | 482 LP | 432 LP | 359 LP | 335 LP | 244 LP | 232 LP | 176 LP | 0 LP | 0 LP |
| Our verdict | Best overall unit for its size, quietest dehumidifier tested, reliable bucket-less mode and easy-to-use app | Largest capacity with a built-in pump and lowest energy use per pint | Honestly still a capable machine when it works, which earns it a spot above several picks' lower ranks, but it is a superseded design coasting on an old Wirecutter crown, and aged stock plus its failure history make the FHDD5034W1 the correct purchase. | Quiet operation and reliable performance in larger rooms | Excellent performance with a sleek design | Best compact dehumidifier for small spaces, low-maintenance, smart-controlled | Good value but app issues and higher noise level than comparable units | The pump-equipped sibling of the top-ranked GE. Same ownership strengths, slightly less outlet validation for this exact model. | Promising and pleasant to use, but multi-year reliability is unproven and DREO has no meaningful compressor-appliance track record yet. | Reliable, energy-efficient, easy to use but pricier than some competitors | The right buy for small rooms, inheriting the Cube platform's strengths. Ranked lower only because it serves a narrower use case, not because it is worse. | Simple touch controls and solid performance in large rooms | Review-volume marketing disguising middling real-world performance and weak warranty support. The Midea Cube outclasses it at the same money. | Wrong technology for most buyers. Desiccant units serve cold-space niches, and anyone shopping a normal room should buy a compressor unit. | Large capacity and pump-enabled design, solid performance in very humid spaces | Not a room dehumidifier at all in any meaningful sense. Fine for a safe or closet, a waste of money against actual damp. | A Peltier unit with negligible extraction. The worst way to spend money in this category if you have a real moisture problem, regardless of how prominently Amazon promotes it. |
| What reviewers rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where it falls short |
| Nothing recorded |
| Nothing recorded |
| Nothing recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evidence behind it | 17 sources across 16 outlets | 8 sources across 8 outlets | 6 sources across 5 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 5 sources across 5 outlets | 3 sources across 3 outlets | 6 sources across 6 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 7 sources across 6 outlets | 3 sources across 3 outlets | 19 sources across 18 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 11 sources across 11 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 13 sources across 12 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets |
| Flagged as one to avoid | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 8 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 10 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 7 research runs | 1 of 9 research runs | 1 of 4 research runs | 2 of 9 research runs | 3 of 8 research runs | 3 of 8 research runs |
| Announced | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Where to buy | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it |
Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.