Compare Creatine

17 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 17 Sept 2026

Pick any two to four of the 17 ranked creatine and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Nutricost Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Thorne Creatine and Optimum Nutrition Micronized Creatine.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

Creatine compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure	Nutricost Nutricost Creatine Monohydrate Powder	Thorne Thorne Creatine	Optimum Nutrition Optimum Nutrition Micronized Creatine	1st Phorm 1st Phorm Micronized Creatine Monohydrate	Bulk Bulk Creatine Monohydrate	WeightWorld WeightWorld Creatine Monohydrate Micronised Powder	Naked Nutrition Naked Nutrition Creatine	Swolverine Swolverine Creatine Monohydrate	Legion Legion Recharge Creatine	Momentous Momentous Creatine	Onnit Onnit Creatine Unflavored	Transparent Labs Transparent Labs Creatine HMB	RAW Nutrition RAW Nutrition Creatine	Free Soul Free Soul Creatine Monohydrate	Create Create Creatine Gummies	Jinfiniti Jinfiniti Creatine + ATP	SWOLY SWOLY Creatine Gummies
Tier	S	S	A	A	B	B	B	B	C	C	C	C	D	F	F	F	F
Rank on this board	1 of 17	2 of 17	3 of 17	4 of 17	5 of 17	6 of 17	7 of 17	8 of 17	9 of 17	10 of 17	11 of 17	12 of 17	13 of 17	14 of 17	15 of 17	16 of 17	17 of 17
Ladder points	1108 LP	1024 LP	813 LP	784 LP	634 LP	608 LP	555 LP	517 LP	473 LP	471 LP	467 LP	391 LP	331 LP	159 LP	0 LP	0 LP	0 LP
Our verdict	GQ's best overall and the brand users name when asked who they trust. Pure monohydrate with nothing to fail.	NSF-certified purity and the top pick of multiple independent 2026 testing roundups. The most trustworthy multi-year rebuy in the category.	A two-decade track record and the best capsule format. Boring, proven, dependable.	BarBend's 2026 expert-tested roundup names it the top overall pick, the strongest single endorsement from a specialist fitness-testing outlet in the current cycle, and it sits on the form of creatine the entire field agrees works - the strongest consensus position in the category.	Independently assessed by Which? and a long-standing plain-monohydrate supplier. Slightly thinner third-party paper trail than the top three.	BBC Good Food's best-value-for-money winner on cost per dose across its full test. The strongest pure-value verdict in current UK testing.	Innerbody's best budget pick. Single-ingredient monohydrate in a plain tub, which is where all your money should go.	Fortune's best powder with published batch testing. Solid, just a younger brand than those above it.	Fortune's tester scored it 4.5 out of 5 across a 14-product field. Genuinely well reviewed, docked for being a blend where the extras are unproven.	NSF certification as standard and Women's Health's vegan pick. Certification is the whole ballgame for a supplement you take daily for years.	WIRED-endorsed plain monohydrate with an unchanged formula for years. Unexciting and reliable.	The most marketed creatine in the category, and an HMB blend you pay a premium for on claims plain monohydrate matches. Buy Thorne Creatine Monohydrate instead.	GQ's best flavored option and a real monohydrate. The flavoring adds nothing to ownership risk but nothing to trust either.	Assessed by Which? and a clean monohydrate, but with the thinnest independent evidence of the picks.	The only gummy with NSF sport certification, per Fortune. Best of a format that this lens fundamentally distrusts.	A self-published top pick built on an unproven ATP add-on. Buy Momentous Creatine instead.	Pushed as best value but sits in a gummy format that third-party testing shows can degrade or underdose creatine, without the certification that saves Create Creatine Gummies. If you want a gummy, buy Create. If you want value, buy Nutricost.
What reviewers rate	Named Best Creatine Overall by GQ Repeatedly volunteered by users as a brand they trust for quality No-frills pure monohydrate from an established manufacturer Pure creatine monohydrate with no premium attached	NSF-certified across its sports line Named Best Overall in Women's Health's dietitian-tested guide Top pick of both experts in a dietitian-led roundup Pure monohydrate, the most studied and most effective form	Named Best Capsule by Women's Health One of the longest-standing brands in sports nutrition Default recommendation for two decades Micronized for better mixability	Clean creatine monohydrate formulation Excellent mixability Built on the form of creatine the entire field agrees works BarBend's top overall pick in its expert-tested guide	Independently assessed by Which? Long-established UK supplier of plain Creapure-style monohydrate Consistent batch testing Pure monohydrate in bulk packaging	BBC Good Food's testing called it the best value for money in cost per dose of everything they tested Micronised monohydrate powder Micronized for better mixability Single-ingredient formula	Single-ingredient monohydrate with no fillers Sold in plain bulk tubs Innerbody's Best Budget Pick Single-ingredient, third-party tested, no fillers	Named Best Creatine Powder by Fortune Single-ingredient powder Brand publishes third-party testing Pure creatine monohydrate	Fortune's hands-on tester scored it 4.5 out of 5 across a 14-product field Creatine monohydrate base plus recovery support Genuinely tested rather than promotional endorsement Scored 4.5 out of 5 in Fortune's 14-powder test	NSF certification built into its entire lineup Named Best Vegan by Women's Health Consistent certification matters more than formulation tweaks for a daily, multi-year supplement Strong third-party certification credentials	WIRED's plain unflavored monohydrate recommendation Same uncomplicated product sold for years with no reformulation drama Built on the most studied and most effective form of creatine Clean single-ingredient monohydrate	Crowned best creatine supplement of 2026 by Forbes Vetted Named Best Creatine Overall by Fortune Forbes Vetted's top pick and Fortune's Best Creatine Overall Creatine monohydrate core	Named Best Flavored Creatine by GQ A genuine monohydrate rather than a proprietary blend Flavored format does not compromise the compound Sold cheap at Walmart per community reports	Assessed by Which? in its independent expert review Straightforward monohydrate Clean plain-mono option Independently assessed by Which?	Named best overall creatine gummy by Fortune NSF third-party sport certified Made with a vegan pectin base Pectin-based and vegan	Combines creatine with disodium ATP in a dual-pathway approach, per its maker Creatine monohydrate paired with disodium ATP for a dual-pathway energy approach Format innovation in a crowded field Named 'Best Overall' in Jinfiniti's own roundup	Named Best Value Creatine by Fortune The consensus gummy answer in current coverage
Where it falls short	Lacks the sport certifications of the top-ranked options	Costs more than house-brand monohydrate powders Costs a flagship premium over commodity monohydrates Premium-priced for the same molecule the budget tubs deliver It is plain monohydrate with a certification, nothing more	Costs slightly more than the commodity tubs for the format and the brand Rarely the absolute cheapest option	Some users report an unpleasant taste when mixed in water Brand premium on plain monohydrate	Slightly thinner third-party paper trail than the top picks Thinner presence in US expert coverage Certification transparency falls short of the US sport-certified brands Slightly less polish and brand recognition than the leading budget rival	Nothing recorded	A hair behind the leaders on cost per serving Isolated user reports suggest batch consistency can vary UK buyers pay noticeably more per serving than domestic alternatives Weaker third-party certification story than the sport-certified brands	A younger brand than the longer-established picks Carries a modest brand premium over house-brand powders	A blend rather than a bare monohydrate, with unproven extras Flavored creatine adds nothing physiologically	Priced like a premium product Pricier than commodity monohydrate Premium-priced plain monohydrate Expensive for what it does, and what it does is what the budget tubs do	Testing transparency is thinner than the certified options Small-container format inflates the per-serving cost	HMB add-on drives cost without proven benefit over plain monohydrate Premium blend rather than certified pure monohydrate Costs more than plain monohydrate for no proven gain The added HMB carries far weaker evidence than the monohydrate core	Flavored versions cost more per gram of creatine than plain powders Flavored creatine is a niche format rather than the main road Flavoring adds nothing physiologically Flavored creatine is a convenience you pay for rather than a performance gain	Lacks the third-party sport certification of the top picks Costs more per gram than the bulk options	Sits in a gummy format that broadly fails third-party certification bars Gummy format delivers far less creatine per serving than powder at a far higher cost Contains added sugars, which dietitian guidance says to avoid Manufacturing heat and processing degrade creatine in gummy delivery systems	Top pick status comes only from the vendor's own blog ATP add-on has no independent testing behind it Proprietary-blend play rather than a certified monohydrate Only "best overall" title comes from its own company blog	Gummy format broadly fails third-party certification bars Third-party testing found many gummies deliver degraded or underdosed creatine because manufacturing heat degrades the compound Lacks the NSF sport certification of the better gummy alternative Gummy manufacturing heat and processing degrade the creatine compound
Evidence behind it	5 sources across 5 outlets	24 sources across 24 outlets	8 sources across 7 outlets	7 sources across 7 outlets	6 sources across 6 outlets	2 sources across 2 outlets	1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	23 sources across 19 outlets	34 sources across 29 outlets	1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	23 sources across 19 outlets	2 sources across 2 outlets	1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	12 sources across 10 outlets	3 sources across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional	5 sources across 4 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	Not flagged	7 of 12 research runs	Not flagged	Not flagged	6 of 11 research runs	10 of 11 research runs	5 of 6 research runs
Announced	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded
Where to buy	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it	Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.