GoMacro MacroBar

Tasting Table's roundup of disappointing bars names GoMacro its least favorite of all, flatly stating this bar isn't worth buying. Its protein density is far below the category standard, so you pay protein-bar money for a granola-bar payload.

You get around 10 grams of protein for 280 calories, one of the worst protein-per-calorie ratios of anything realistically cross-shopped in this category, and it is expensive for what it does. Plant-based buyers should get the Aloha Organic Plant Protein Bar instead, which holds the same clean-label position with far stronger expert backing.

Low protein for a bar in this category and a texture the harshest testers actively disliked; Tasting Table names it its least favorite bar in the category and says flatly that it isn't worth buying. Plant-based buyers should head to Aloha instead.

Around 10g of protein for 280 calories is close to the worst protein density of any bar a shopper will realistically cross-shop, and it is sold at a premium organic price on top of that. Its reputation is lifestyle, not performance; Aloha-style options and IQBAR deliver more protein per calorie, and Kirkland beats it outright for protein.

Tasting Table's roundup of disappointing protein bars names it its least favorite of all, flatly stating the bar is not worth buying. You get only around 10 grams of protein for a large calorie load, which is poor protein density for a protein bar; Aloha is the better-supported plant-based buy.

Only around 10 grams of protein for 280 calories per bar, the worst protein-per-calorie ratio of the bars here, and it was named least favorite of all by Tasting Table. It survives on wellness branding; buy David or Kirkland for real protein per calorie.

10g of protein for 280 calories is the worst protein-to-calorie ratio of any mainstream bar, and Tasting Table ranks the brand worst in the category. It is a pleasant oat-cookie meal replacement wearing a protein-bar label. Buy IQBAR for plant-based protein that actually shows up.