Camp Chef XXL Pro
Not favored when compared with the Woodwind Pro model.
Consolidated from 4 independent outlets
Where the cited sources landed, as we read them
2 of 4 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.
Wirecutter notes frequent reliability issues and a high price point that isn’t justified by performance; Consumer Reports flags it as overpriced relative to its features.
Flagged 29 July 2026
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link.
Pros & cons
- ✓ Large capacity
- ✓ Heavy-gauge steel build
- ✓ Five-year warranty
- ✓ Very large cooking area
- ✓ Robust build
- ✗ Less favorable than Woodwind Pro
- ✗ Higher price
- ✗ Firmware updates less frequent
- ✗ Reliability problems
- ✗ High price
The sources behind this ranking
We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found. 1 outlet wouldn't let us check its link.
Frequently asked questions
It ranks #11 (D tier) on our consolidated pellet grills board, drawn from 4 independent outlets.
Less favorable than Woodwind Pro. Higher price. Firmware updates less frequent. Reliability problems. High price.
Ranked nearby in Pellet Grills
S tier #1 Camp Chef Woodwind Pro 24
A tier #2 1 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Traeger Ironwood XL
A tier #3 Recteq RT-B380 Bullseye
C tier #6 1 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Camp Chef XT 24
C tier #7 2 of 6 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Traeger Pro 22
D tier #8 1 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Weber Searwood
D tier #9 2 of 5 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Pit Boss 850 DX
D tier #10 1 of 5 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Coyote C13P6-FS 36-Inch Pellet Grill
D tier #12 1 of 5 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Z GRILLS 450B Pioneer
F tier #13 2 of 6 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.