Compare Protein Powders
18 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 17 Sept 2026
Pick any two to four of the 18 ranked protein powders and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Optimum Nutrition Gold Standard 100% Whey, Transparent Labs Grass-Fed Whey Protein Isolate and Thorne Whey Protein Isolate.
Choose what to compare
3 of 4 chosen
S
A
B
C
D
F
| Measure | Optimum Nutrition Optimum Nutrition Gold Standard 100% Whey | Transparent Labs Transparent Labs Grass-Fed Whey Protein Isolate | Thorne Thorne Whey Protein Isolate | Nutricost Nutricost Whey Protein Concentrate Powder | Legion Legion Whey+ | Dymatize Dymatize ISO-100 | Momentous Momentous Whey Protein Isolate | NOW Foods NOW Foods Whey Protein (Creamy Chocolate) | Naked Nutrition Naked Whey | Swolverine Swolverine Plant Protein | Orgain Orgain Organic Vegan Protein Powder | Equate Equate Whey Protein Powder | Ascent Ascent Clear Whey Protein Powder | Factor Form Factor Form Whey Protein | Sprout Living Sprout Living Epic Protein Vanilla Lucuma | BioSteel BioSteel Vanilla Whey Protein | Truvani Truvani Plant Based Protein Powder | Premier Protein Premier Protein Powder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | S | A | A | A | B | B | B | C | C | C | C | C | C | D | D | F | F |
| Rank on this board | 1 of 18 | 2 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 4 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 14 of 18 | 15 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 18 of 18 |
| Ladder points | 1356 LP | 1049 LP | 742 LP | 717 LP | 645 LP | 607 LP | 579 LP | 546 LP | 459 LP | 447 LP | 445 LP | 421 LP | 409 LP | 382 LP | 307 LP | 257 LP | 206 LP | 73 LP |
| Our verdict | Not unsafe, just outclassed: a concentrate blend trading on fifteen-year-old goodwill while isolates beat it on every ownership metric. It still sweeps legacy roundups, but community sentiment has shifted against it. | The consensus best protein powder of the current cycle: Labdoor-verified label accuracy, an 88% protein-by-weight ratio, flawless mixability, and the same clean formula year after year. The safest tub to own for a decade. | A certification-first brand whose reputation rests entirely on consistency, with NSF certification and clinical-grade manufacturing. Tastes good enough that you will actually finish the tub. | The honest budget tub: clean, simple, mixes fine, and the community's designated alternative to overpriced brands. Ownership value nobody else on this board matches. | Batch-tested, no artificial sweeteners, and a perfect score from Fortune's dietitians. Slightly thinner evidence base than the top two, but the same ownership philosophy. | A pure isolate with a long, quiet record of mixing instantly and digesting easily. Uncited this cycle, but its multi-year mainstream standing earns the slot. | Batch-certified for sport, which is the gold-standard ownership guarantee. Uncited this cycle, ranked on the strength of that verification model. | The no-drama legacy tub from a company that does not reformulate. Uncited this cycle, kept for its exceptional stability. | Outstanding ingredient simplicity and third-party certification, held back by a low protein-by-weight ratio and an unflavored taste many owners bail on. | Two major outlets call it the best vegan powder and back it with testing claims, so you pay up from Orgain and here the product earns it. It ranks just behind Orgain under this lens because Orgain delivers a comparable experience for less money. | The plant-based and budget slot. Formula-stable and widely available, but a blend with a middling protein-per-scoop ratio. | The purest expression of the value lens. Consumer Reports found low lead levels in its tests, and budget-comparison coverage treats it as the benchmark store-brand whey that pricier tubs have to beat. It delivers the core whey experience for the least money on the board, which is why it takes the top spot. | A legit top-pick listing from Steady Athlete and the best entry into clear whey, a fast-growing niche for people who hate milky shakes. It ranks last among the picks only because its value case is thinner than the others, not because the product fails. | The best-tasting and most travel-friendly of the well-sourced picks, from a younger brand with a shorter track record. | The taste winner among vegan powders per Health.com's dietitian testing, but it is priced as a premium product, which keeps it out of the top tier under this lens. Buy it for enjoyment, not value. | Clean sports whey with an expert-list slot and no boutique markup. Slightly less proven than the top four, hence the position. | The most aggressively marketed premium plant protein examined, and it landed in Consumer Reports' heavy metal lead testing. Boutique pricing plus regulatory-adjacent scrutiny with no compensating test results places it last on the board. | Low lead per Consumer Reports and huge availability, but the formulation leans on sucralose and the brand's position rests on marketing reach, not testing discipline. Buy Optimum Nutrition Gold Standard 100% Whey instead. |
| What reviewers rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where it falls short |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evidence behind it | 50 sources across 40 outlets | 13 sources across 10 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 9 sources across 8 outlets | 21 sources across 18 outlets | 32 sources across 29 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 23 sources across 19 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 9 sources across 9 outlets | 3 sources across 2 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 2 sources across 2 outlets | 8 sources across 7 outlets |
| Flagged as one to avoid | 1 of 15 research runs | 1 of 15 research runs | 1 of 15 research runs | 2 of 8 research runs | Not flagged | 1 of 6 research runs | 1 of 7 research runs | Not flagged | 2 of 15 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 4 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 4 research runs | 2 of 4 research runs | 3 of 7 research runs | 4 of 6 research runs |
| Announced | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Where to buy | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it |
Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.