Best Printers

Compare Printers

19 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 13 Sept 2026

Pick any two to four of the 19 ranked printers and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Epson EcoTank ET-2980, Brother HL-L2460DW and Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850.

Choose what to compare

3 of 4 chosen

S
A
B
C
D
F
Printers compared side by side. Each column is one product, each row is one measure taken from the same research that built the board.
Measure Epson EcoTank ET-2980 Epson Epson EcoTank ET-2980 Brother HL-L2460DW Brother Brother HL-L2460DW Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850 Epson Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850 Brother MFC-L3780CDW Brother Brother MFC-L3780CDW Brother MFC-L2900DW XL Brother Brother MFC-L2900DW XL Brother MFC-L8930CDW Brother Brother MFC-L8930CDW HP OfficeJet Pro 9125e HP HP OfficeJet Pro 9125e Epson EcoTank ET-3950 Epson Epson EcoTank ET-3950 Epson EcoTank ET-5850 Epson Epson EcoTank ET-5850 Brother MFC-J4355DW Brother Brother MFC-J4355DW Canon imageCLASS MF753Cdw II Canon Canon imageCLASS MF753Cdw II Brother MFC-T780DW Brother Brother MFC-T780DW HP LaserJet M209d HP HP LaserJet M209d Brother MFC-L2820DW Brother Brother MFC-L2820DW Epson Expression Home XP-4200 Epson Epson Expression Home XP-4200 Canon PIXMA TR4720 Canon Canon PIXMA TR4720 Canon MegaTank PIXMA G3290 Canon Canon MegaTank PIXMA G3290 HP Envy Inspire 7955e HP HP Envy Inspire 7955e HP DeskJet 2855e HP HP DeskJet 2855e
Tier S A A A A B B C C C C C D D F F F F F
Rank on this board 1 of 19 2 of 19 3 of 19 4 of 19 5 of 19 6 of 19 7 of 19 8 of 19 9 of 19 10 of 19 11 of 19 12 of 19 13 of 19 14 of 19 15 of 19 16 of 19 17 of 19 18 of 19 19 of 19
Ladder points 1052 LP 793 LP 714 LP 662 LP 649 LP 560 LP 552 LP 452 LP 442 LP 403 LP 369 LP 367 LP 300 LP 278 LP 179 LP 83 LP 81 LP 0 LP 0 LP
Our verdict The RTINGS “best home printer” roundup lists it as the top choice for everyday use, citing its low running cost, easy refill system, and solid print quality. Wirecutter’s “best laser printer” guide names it the best monochrome laser for home use, noting its clear text output and easy wireless connectivity. The most versatile all-in-one with the highest speed, capacity, and lowest long-term cost. PCMag’s 2026 “best printers” article highlights it as the best all-in-one for small offices, commending its speed, duplex scanning, and user-friendly interface. XL version adds a larger paper capacity without compromising reliability. Slow and expensive to run. Not worth the cost. Wirecutter’s “best printers” roundup calls it the best overall home printer, citing its fast printing, integrated app, and low ink cost. Wirecutter’s 2026 “best printers” guide names it the best all-in-one for photo-ready output, noting its straightforward setup and high-resolution color prints. RTINGS.com lists it as the best small-office printer, praising its fast speed, generous paper capacity, and low cost-per-page. Inkjet all-in-one balances cost per page with reliable operation. Tom’s Guide’s 2026 “best all-in-one printers” list names it the best overall, praising its high-quality color prints, fast speed, and robust build. Strong ink-tank system but slower than the top picks. Consumer Reports’ “best printers” list includes it as a good monochrome laser, but the review points out its lack of Wi-Fi and higher toner cost per page compared to newer models, reducing its long-term value. RTINGS.com lists it as the best cheap printer, pointing out its reliable performance, simple setup, and good value for budget buyers. RTINGS.com lists it as the best cheap printer for occasional use, highlighting its simple setup and adequate print quality for everyday documents. Unreliable ink system, frequent errors, poor long-term reliability. Poor color accuracy and fragile build. Avoid for serious work. PCMag’s 2026 “best printers” guide lists it as the best home printer for photo-ready output, noting its high-resolution color prints and easy Wi-Fi setup. High maintenance cost and frequent printhead issues.
What reviewers rate
  • Low running cost per print
  • Easy refill system
  • Solid print quality
  • Affordable ink-tank model
  • Clear text output
  • Easy wireless connectivity
  • Low running cost
  • Reliable monochrome laser
  • All-in-one ink-tank system
  • Very high print speed
  • Large ink capacity
  • Low running cost
  • Speed
  • Duplex scanning
  • User-friendly interface
  • All-in-one laser
  • Large paper capacity
  • High-capacity monochrome laser
  • Handles heavy workloads
  • Fast print speed
  • Feature set
  • Best all-in-one tested
  • Outstanding document print quality
  • Blisteringly quick speed
  • Fast printing
  • Integrated app
  • Low ink cost
  • Reliable performance
  • High-resolution color prints
  • Straightforward setup
  • Large ink capacity
  • Fast printing
  • Fast speed
  • Generous paper capacity
  • Low cost-per-page
  • Cost per page
  • Versatile inkjet all-in-one
  • Balances speed, quality and cost
  • Low ink consumption per page
  • High-quality color prints
  • Fast speed
  • Robust build
  • Excellent print quality
  • Ink-tank system
  • All-in-one
  • Good reliability
  • Laser-like running costs at inkjet pricing
  • Compact footprint
  • Sells on the HP name
  • Reliable performance
  • Simple setup
  • Good value
  • Reliable all-in-one
  • Simple setup
  • Adequate print quality for everyday documents
  • Affordable for occasional use
  • Easy to set up
  • Solid photo & document printing
  • Small footprint
  • Easy setup
  • Good color fidelity
  • Large ink tank capacity
  • Good for high volume printing
  • Solid print quality
  • High-quality color photos with vibrant detail
  • High-resolution color prints
  • Easy Wi-Fi setup
  • Reliable performance
  • Good support
  • Basic printing
  • Best cheap printer for home use per RTINGS
  • Rock-bottom sticker price
  • The default 'cheap printer' at every big-box store, so it's everywhere
Where it falls short
  • Slower than the machines ranked above it
  • Less office-capable
  • Mono-only single function: no color printing, scanning or copying
  • Still an inkjet - carries clog risk if it sits idle
  • Less build headroom than the heavier-duty L8930CDW
  • Slower print speeds compared to peers
  • Higher ink consumption increases running costs
  • Maintenance requirements are greater than expected
  • Slightly more to break than the simpler, cheaper HL-L2460DW
  • High operating costs
  • Slow speed
  • Overkill and overpriced for light home use
  • HP's firmware updates and cartridge authentication work against the owner
  • Poor support reputation
  • Higher purchase price
  • Higher per-page cost compared to ET-2980
  • Inkjet heads can clog if unused for weeks
  • Middling photo quality
  • Firmware updates lag
  • Higher failure rate for large tank
  • Steep replacement part costs
  • Long-term running costs above the true tank printers
  • Long-term service reputation a notch below Brother
  • Slightly fussier toner pricing
  • Patchy availability in North America
  • Thin review coverage
  • No Wi-Fi
  • Higher toner cost per page
  • Minimal feature set
  • Outclassed and out-priced by the Brother HL-L2460DW, which has cheaper toner
  • Average speed
  • Basic features
  • Limited functionality
  • Toner leakage
  • Small, expensive cartridges - running costs will quietly double its price
  • Light-duty build
  • Exists largely to upsell buyers to the EcoTank line
  • Unreliable ink system
  • Frequent error messages
  • Poor color accuracy
  • High cost per page
  • Poor color accuracy
  • Fragile design
  • Ink leakage
  • Inconsistent print quality
  • High price for the quality
  • Mediocre print quality
  • Driver issues
  • Slow firmware updates
  • Frequent printhead clogs
  • Limited firmware support
  • Higher failure rate
  • Slow print speed
Evidence behind it 41 sources across 31 outlets 34 sources across 29 outlets 25 sources across 19 outlets 22 sources across 12 outlets 8 sources across 8 outlets 19 sources across 14 outlets 50 sources across 31 outlets 31 sources across 24 outlets 23 sources across 18 outlets 9 sources across 7 outlets 12 sources across 10 outlets 9 sources across 7 outlets 25 sources across 14 outlets 29 sources across 25 outlets 18 sources across 18 outlets 31 sources across 28 outlets 27 sources across 25 outlets 14 sources across 14 outlets 47 sources across 39 outlets
Flagged as one to avoid Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 7 research runs 1 of 10 research runs Not flagged 1 of 6 research runs 1 of 2 research runs Not flagged Not flagged Not flagged 1 of 2 research runs 3 of 8 research runs Not flagged 2 of 6 research runs 3 of 8 research runs 4 of 9 research runs 3 of 6 research runs
Announced Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded
Where to buy Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it Check it

Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.