Compare Printers
19 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 13 Sept 2026
Pick any two to four of the 19 ranked printers and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Epson EcoTank ET-2980, Brother HL-L2460DW and Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850.
Choose what to compare
3 of 4 chosen
S
A
B
C
D
F
| Measure | Epson Epson EcoTank ET-2980 | Brother Brother HL-L2460DW | Epson Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850 | Brother Brother MFC-L3780CDW | Brother Brother MFC-L2900DW XL | Brother Brother MFC-L8930CDW | HP HP OfficeJet Pro 9125e | Epson Epson EcoTank ET-3950 | Epson Epson EcoTank ET-5850 | Brother Brother MFC-J4355DW | Canon Canon imageCLASS MF753Cdw II | Brother Brother MFC-T780DW | HP HP LaserJet M209d | Brother Brother MFC-L2820DW | Epson Epson Expression Home XP-4200 | Canon Canon PIXMA TR4720 | Canon Canon MegaTank PIXMA G3290 | HP HP Envy Inspire 7955e | HP HP DeskJet 2855e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | A | A | A | A | B | B | C | C | C | C | C | D | D | F | F | F | F | F |
| Rank on this board | 1 of 19 | 2 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 6 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 11 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 17 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 19 of 19 |
| Ladder points | 1052 LP | 793 LP | 714 LP | 662 LP | 649 LP | 560 LP | 552 LP | 452 LP | 442 LP | 403 LP | 369 LP | 367 LP | 300 LP | 278 LP | 179 LP | 83 LP | 81 LP | 0 LP | 0 LP |
| Our verdict | The RTINGS “best home printer” roundup lists it as the top choice for everyday use, citing its low running cost, easy refill system, and solid print quality. | Wirecutter’s “best laser printer” guide names it the best monochrome laser for home use, noting its clear text output and easy wireless connectivity. | The most versatile all-in-one with the highest speed, capacity, and lowest long-term cost. | PCMag’s 2026 “best printers” article highlights it as the best all-in-one for small offices, commending its speed, duplex scanning, and user-friendly interface. | XL version adds a larger paper capacity without compromising reliability. | Slow and expensive to run. Not worth the cost. | Wirecutter’s “best printers” roundup calls it the best overall home printer, citing its fast printing, integrated app, and low ink cost. | Wirecutter’s 2026 “best printers” guide names it the best all-in-one for photo-ready output, noting its straightforward setup and high-resolution color prints. | RTINGS.com lists it as the best small-office printer, praising its fast speed, generous paper capacity, and low cost-per-page. | Inkjet all-in-one balances cost per page with reliable operation. | Tom’s Guide’s 2026 “best all-in-one printers” list names it the best overall, praising its high-quality color prints, fast speed, and robust build. | Strong ink-tank system but slower than the top picks. | Consumer Reports’ “best printers” list includes it as a good monochrome laser, but the review points out its lack of Wi-Fi and higher toner cost per page compared to newer models, reducing its long-term value. | RTINGS.com lists it as the best cheap printer, pointing out its reliable performance, simple setup, and good value for budget buyers. | RTINGS.com lists it as the best cheap printer for occasional use, highlighting its simple setup and adequate print quality for everyday documents. | Unreliable ink system, frequent errors, poor long-term reliability. | Poor color accuracy and fragile build. Avoid for serious work. | PCMag’s 2026 “best printers” guide lists it as the best home printer for photo-ready output, noting its high-resolution color prints and easy Wi-Fi setup. | High maintenance cost and frequent printhead issues. |
| What reviewers rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where it falls short |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evidence behind it | 41 sources across 31 outlets | 34 sources across 29 outlets | 25 sources across 19 outlets | 22 sources across 12 outlets | 8 sources across 8 outlets | 19 sources across 14 outlets | 50 sources across 31 outlets | 31 sources across 24 outlets | 23 sources across 18 outlets | 9 sources across 7 outlets | 12 sources across 10 outlets | 9 sources across 7 outlets | 25 sources across 14 outlets | 29 sources across 25 outlets | 18 sources across 18 outlets | 31 sources across 28 outlets | 27 sources across 25 outlets | 14 sources across 14 outlets | 47 sources across 39 outlets |
| Flagged as one to avoid | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 7 research runs | 1 of 10 research runs | Not flagged | 1 of 6 research runs | 1 of 2 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 2 research runs | 3 of 8 research runs | Not flagged | 2 of 6 research runs | 3 of 8 research runs | 4 of 9 research runs | 3 of 6 research runs |
| Announced | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Where to buy | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it |
Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.