Compare Electric Kettles
14 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 1 Sept 2026
Pick any two to four of the 14 ranked electric kettles and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Cuisinart PerfecTemp CPK-17, OXO Brew Adjustable Temperature Kettle and Cosori Electric Gooseneck Kettle.
Choose what to compare
3 of 4 chosen
S
A
B
C
D
F
| Measure | Cuisinart Cuisinart PerfecTemp CPK-17 | OXO OXO Brew Adjustable Temperature Kettle | Cosori Cosori Electric Gooseneck Kettle | Fellow Fellow Stagg EKG Pro | Breville Breville Smart Kettle Luxe | Cosori Cosori Original Electric Glass Kettle GK172-CO | Zwilling Zwilling Enfinigy Cool Touch Kettle Pro | Ninja Ninja Precision Temperature Kettle KT200 | OXO OXO Brew Gooseneck Kettle | Fellow Fellow Corvo EKG | Bonavita Bonavita Variable Temperature Gooseneck Kettle | Smeg Smeg KLF04 Variable Temperature Kettle | Hamilton Beach Hamilton Beach 1L Electric Kettle | Amazon Basics Amazon Basics Stainless Steel Electric Kettle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | A | A | A | B | B | C | C | C | C | D | F | F | F |
| Rank on this board | 1 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 13 of 14 | 14 of 14 |
| Ladder points | 866 LP | 827 LP | 677 LP | 673 LP | 638 LP | 524 LP | 486 LP | 468 LP | 457 LP | 430 LP | 281 LP | 114 LP | 25 LP | 0 LP |
| Our verdict | Although it is often cited as the “favorite” in buying guides, its long-term reliability is questionable. Recent reports note frequent heating element failures within two years of use, making it a risky purchase for those who want longevity. | The gooseneck design and stainless-steel construction give it a long life. Its temperature presets are accurate, and the unit has consistently high ratings for reliability in recent buying guides. | Combines a steel-inside body with a glass exterior, giving it both durability and aesthetic appeal. It heats quickly, offers multiple temperature settings, and has no reported long-term failures in the latest reviews. | The most reliable, long-term performer. It has a stainless-steel body, a sealed heating element, and a proven track record of lasting beyond five years in the field. Its variable-temperature precision is unmatched for specialty teas and pour-over coffee. | Known for its robust build and quiet boil feature. The stainless-steel body and sealed heating element have shown a low failure rate in the last two years of testing, making it a dependable mid-price option. | The budget consensus: cheap, with a 1500W element and clean materials, it owns the value slot outright. | The cool-touch exterior and stainless-steel body give it a durable feel, while the variable temperature control is accurate. Recent reviews note its longevity beyond three years. | The unit’s variable temperature feature is unreliable, with several reviewers noting inaccurate readings and inconsistent heating. Its build quality (plastic body) also raises concerns about durability beyond a year of use. | The classic gooseneck model offers a sturdy steel body and reliable heating. It is praised for its quiet operation and long-term reliability in recent buying guides. | A smaller, more affordable version of the Pro that still retains the same stainless-steel body and accurate temperature control. It has a solid track record for durability in recent reviews. | Excellent accuracy but pricier than comparable models, placing it in the middle of the pack. | A stylish, stainless-steel kettle that has shown reliable performance in the last two years of testing. Its variable temperature feature is precise and its build quality is solid. | While marketed as a stylish, compact option, it has a plastic exterior and an exposed heating element that tend to fail early. Warranty is limited to one year, and reviews highlight frequent overheating issues. | This budget model has a plastic body and an exposed heating element that are prone to wear. Reviews consistently report early failures (within 1-2 years) and lack of a robust warranty, making it unsuitable for long-term use. |
| What reviewers rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where it falls short |
| Nothing recorded |
|
|
| Nothing recorded |
|
|
|
| Nothing recorded |
|
|
|
| Evidence behind it | 14 sources across 13 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 9 sources across 8 outlets | 36 sources across 33 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 8 sources across 4 outlets | 16 sources across 14 outlets | 5 sources across 5 outlets | 19 sources across 18 outlets | 11 sources across 10 outlets | 3 sources across 3 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 2 sources across 2 outlets | 2 sources across 2 outlets |
| Flagged as one to avoid | 1 of 9 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 8 research runs | 1 of 9 research runs | Not flagged | Not flagged | Not flagged | 1 of 7 research runs | 3 of 8 research runs | 3 of 7 research runs |
| Announced | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Where to buy | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it |
Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.