Smeg

Smeg 50's Style Hand Mixer (HMF01)

F
Ranked #13 in Hand Mixers
0 LP on the category ladder what's LP?

Well built but a style premium with a modest motor, outclassed on ownership value by the Breville and Braun at comparable money. Buy the Breville Handy Mix Scraper instead.

Consolidated from 4 cited sources across 3 outlets

Where the cited sources landed, as we read them

  • 4 positive sources
See the sources
Flagged as a product to avoid

8 of 15 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.

You pay a large style premium for a modest motor, and the Breville Handy Mix Scraper costs similar money and outperforms it outright, so ownership value over years is poor even though the machine will probably last.

Flagged 17 September 2026
  1. You pay a large style premium for a modest motor, and the Breville Handy Mix Scraper costs similar money and outperforms it outright, so ownership value over years is poor even though the machine will probably last.

    Flagged 17 September 2026
  2. The category's clearest style tax: you pay flagship money largely for the 50's retro body, and the Breville Handy Mix Scraper or the KitchenAid 7-speed beats it as a mixer for less.

    Flagged 17 September 2026
  3. Buyers pay a large styling premium for performance that tested outlets consistently find merely adequate next to the Breville or Braun; the Braun MultiMix 5 matches or beats it for far less money. You are paying for the badge.

    Flagged 16 September 2026
  4. The category's clearest case of paying a large premium for retro styling rather than mixing ability - good largely because it is expensive. The Braun MultiMix 5 delivers mid-range performance for far less, and the Breville is the better flagship.

    Flagged 16 September 2026
  5. The category's purest style tax: it sits at the very top of the category's pricing on the strength of 50's-retro looks while the Braun MultiMix 5 and Breville Handy Mix Scraper match or beat its mixing performance. Nobody disputes it works, but you are paying for the styling, not the mixing.

    Flagged 16 September 2026
  6. You pay a large design premium for a mixer that delivers less mixing capability than the Braun MultiMix 5 or the Breville Handy Mix Scraper. The build is genuinely solid, but for real power per dollar the Braun or Breville is the buy.

    Flagged 16 September 2026
  7. The biggest style tax in the category: The English Home's praise is explicitly bound up with the retro 50's aesthetic, and no performance-focused roundup - Consumer Reports, Good Housekeeping, Food Network, Allrecipes, Serious Eats - gives it a single award slot. Good performance, expensive for what it does, bought for the looks.

    Flagged 16 September 2026
  8. It is the most expensive-adjacent machine on this board and won no award in any of the retrieved 2026 lab tests, where Best Overall went to the Breville, Best for Baking to the Braun MultiMix 5, and Best Value to the Hamilton Beach. You are buying a silhouette, not a mixer.

    Flagged 16 September 2026

Why the boards include products to avoid

Check price

Pros & cons

  • ✓ Well built and likely to last
  • ✓ Included among the best hand mixers on test by The English Home
  • ✓ Capable mixing performance
  • ✓ Well built and genuinely capable - a real machine, not just eye candy
  • ✓ Distinctive 50's retro styling
  • ✗ Large style premium for a modest motor
  • ✗ Poor ownership value over years relative to rivals at similar cost
  • ✗ You pay flagship money largely for the retro 50's styling
  • ✗ Beaten as a mixer by cheaper rivals
  • ✗ Its appeal rests as much on design as on mixing performance

The sources behind this ranking

We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found.

Evidence 1 article and 3 video reviews

Frequently asked questions

It ranks #13 of 15 on our hand mixers tier list, in F tier. That placement draws on 4 cited sources across 3 outlets.

None of the 4 sources with a clear view is critical of it. Large style premium for a modest motor. Poor ownership value over years relative to rivals at similar cost. You pay flagship money largely for the retro 50's styling. Beaten as a mixer by cheaper rivals. Its appeal rests as much on design as on mixing performance.

Ranked nearby in Hand Mixers