Shark

Shark S1000 Steam Mop

Ranked #9 in Steam Mops

411 LP on the category ladder what's LP?

Good Housekeeping's Best Value. Its very simplicity means few failure points, but it does less than every pick above it.

Consolidated from 5 independent outlets

Where the cited sources landed, as we read them

3 positive sources

See the sources

Flagged as a product to avoid

1 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.

Inconsistent steam pressure and higher failure rate after 12 months make it less reliable.
Flagged 28 July 2026

Why the boards include products to avoid

Check price

Pros & cons

✓ Good Housekeeping's Best Value pick
✓ Deliberately bare-bones with very little to break
✓ Named Best Overall out of 50 steam mops tested by Better Homes & Gardens
✓ Excels at cleaning pet messes and grout
✓ Sanitizes hardwood and tile without chemicals

✗ One steam level and no gadgets, so little headroom
✗ Inconsistent steam pressure
✗ Higher-than-expected failure rate after 12 months
✗ Lower build quality compared to other Shark models

The sources behind this ranking

We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found. 2 outlets wouldn't let us check their links. We quote no words from these sources, so each row shows only where we placed it.

Evidence 3 articles, 1 video review and 1 community source

3 positive sources

Good Housekeeping Article Read C

Consumer Pick YouTube review Watch B

Better Homes & Gardens Article Read

2 stance not read sources

Reviewed Article Read C r/CleaningTips Reddit thread Read thread

Frequently asked questions

It ranks #9 of 14 on our steam mops tier list, in C tier. That placement draws on 5 independent outlets.

None of the 3 sources with a clear view is critical of it. One steam level and no gadgets, so little headroom. Inconsistent steam pressure. Higher-than-expected failure rate after 12 months. Lower build quality compared to other Shark models.