PetSafe Smart Covered Self-Cleaning Litter Box
The recurring complaint about odor retention makes it an undesirable option for many owners.
Backed by one cited source so far - limited coverage
See the source2 of 3 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.
The covered design leads to frequent odor buildup and requires daily manual cleaning of the cover, undermining the “self-cleaning” promise. Firmware updates have been sparse, and owners report a high failure rate after two years.
Flagged 29 July 2026
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link.
Pros & cons
- ✓ All-round performance
- ✓ Mid-range price
- ✗ Odor retention
- ✗ Plastic interior
- ✗ Frequent odor buildup
- ✗ Daily manual cover cleaning required
The sources behind this ranking
We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found.
Frequently asked questions
It ranks #9 (F tier) on our consolidated self-cleaning litter boxes board, on one cited source.
Odor retention. Plastic interior. Frequent odor buildup. Daily manual cover cleaning required.
Ranked nearby in Self-Cleaning Litter Boxes
S tier #1 Litter-Robot 5 Pro
S tier #2 Litter-Robot 4
A tier #3 PetKit Purobot Max Pro 2
C tier #4 1 of 6 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Neakasa M1 Open-Top
C tier #5 PetKit PuraMax Self-Cleaning Litter Box
C tier #6 2 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. PetSafe ScoopFree Crystal
D tier #7 Litter-Robot 5
D tier #8 2 of 6 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. PetZone Smart Scoop
F tier #10 3 of 5 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. HHOLOVE Litter-Robot
F tier #11 3 of 4 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.