Franklin Sensors ProSensor T13
Compact and low-maintenance, yet its battery life and depth are inferior to the M210.
Backed by one cited source so far - limited coverage
See the source1 of 4 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.
A low-cost variant that lacks depth sensing and has a smaller display; reviewers find it less reliable than the ProSensor M210 or 710+ for complex walls.
Flagged 29 July 2026
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link.
Pros & cons
- ✓ Battery-free operation
- ✓ compact size
- ✓ long life
- ✓ Budget-friendly per HGTV
- ✓ 13-sensor array
- ✗ No depth sensing capability
- ✗ Smaller display reduces usability
The sources behind this ranking
We searched the web and YouTube for what has been published about this product, then read the articles, video transcripts and comments we found.
Frequently asked questions
It ranks #11 of 14 on our stud finders tier list, in D tier. That placement rests on one cited source.
No depth sensing capability. Smaller display reduces usability.
Ranked nearby in Stud Finders
S tier #1 Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710+
A tier #2 Bosch Wall Scanner
C tier #6 1 of 7 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Precision
C tier #7 Craftsman Hi-Vis Stud Sensor
C tier #8 2 of 4 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Zircon MultiScanner A200
C tier #9 1 of 2 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. StudPop Original Smart Magnetic Stud Finder
C tier #10 1 of 6 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Prexiso 2-in-1 Stud Finder
F tier #12 2 of 5 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Franklin Sensors ProSensor X2100
F tier #13 2 of 4 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick. Ryobi Whole Stud Finder
F tier #14 4 of 6 research runs entered this as a product to avoid rather than a pick.