Compare Charcoal Grills
14 ranked products · Two to 4 at a time · Updated 17 Oct 2026
Pick any two to four of the 14 ranked charcoal grills and read them side by side. This page opens on the board's top 3, Weber Original Kettle Premium 22" Charcoal Grill, Kamado Joe Classic III and Big Green Egg Classic.
Choose what to compare
3 of 4 chosen
S
A
B
C
D
F
| Measure | Weber Weber Original Kettle Premium 22" Charcoal Grill | Kamado Joe Kamado Joe Classic III | Big Green Egg Big Green Egg Classic | Weber Weber Master-Touch Charcoal Kettle Grill | Char-Griller Char-Griller Akorn Kamado Charcoal Grill | Weber Weber Jumbo Joe Premium | VonHaus VonHaus XL American BBQ Grill with Smoker | Nexgrill Nexgrill Charcoal Grill With Side Shelf | Nexgrill Nexgrill Cart-Style Charcoal Grill | Weber Weber Original Kettle Premium 20" Charcoal Grill | Cuisinart Cuisinart CGS-4 | Char-Griller Char-Griller Classic Kettle | Char-Griller Char-Griller Econo-Kettle | Char-Griller Char-Griller Deluxe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | S | S | A | B | B | C | C | D | F | F | F | F | F | F |
| Rank on this board | 1 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 13 of 14 | 14 of 14 |
| Ladder points | 1655 LP | 1074 LP | 856 LP | 622 LP | 605 LP | 448 LP | 370 LP | 237 LP | 111 LP | 104 LP | 46 LP | 0 LP | 0 LP | 0 LP |
| Our verdict | The most proven long-term ownership story in the category, with a Wirecutter pick streak running since 2017 and a parts ecosystem that keeps decades-old units cooking. Nothing else combines this service life with this ease of ownership. | The best-engineered kamado with the best included hardware and the strongest warranty story in its class. Ceramic that cannot rust, and it beats the Big Green Egg head-to-head while costing meaningfully less. | The build is genuinely excellent and the ceramic will outlast you, which is why it outranks the remaining picks despite the trap label. The trap is the ownership package around that ceramic: a large premium over the Kamado Joe Classic III for fewer included accessories and higher fuel use. Buy the Classic III. | The kettle platform with upgraded cooking hardware and full Weber parts support. A strong long-term buy, ranked just below the plain 22-inch only because its advantages are convenience rather than longevity. | The budget kamado with a real decade-plus track record and crack-resistant triple-wall steel. It cannot match ceramic longevity or Char-Griller's weak support, but at its position in the market it is the value pick that survives. | The Smokey Joe's durability with enough grate to feed a family. Same build quality, same parts network, slightly more useful. | The marketplace kettle-plus-smoker combo that beginners cross-shop because it promises two products in one. No serious testing outlet ranks it, and combo grills of this type consistently fail the do-both-well test in this category. A first-time buyer should buy the Weber Original Kettle 22-inch and add smoking technique, not hardware. | A big-box charcoal grill with zero authoritative testing coverage, which under this lens is disqualifying. The Weber kettle is the same job done right. | Cart convenience built on budget steel is the opposite of what lasts. The Weber Original Kettle Premium 22" outlives it several times over. | Identical build and parts story to the 22-inch in a smaller package. Ranked here purely for capacity, not quality. | No mentions or discussion indicate it is not a popular choice among users. | The thinnest steel of any full-size kettle here, with a 400°F ceiling that rules out proper searing. The Weber Original Kettle 22-inch is the grill this one imitates, and it does everything better for similar money. | The budget kettle big-box listings push at every charcoal search, and the one with no expert support. The Weber Original Kettle 22-inch Charcoal Grill is the buy. | Retailer and owner feedback is positive, but no major testing outlet put it through a current test cycle, so it lands at the bottom of the picks. |
| What reviewers rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Where it falls short |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evidence behind it | 8 sources across 7 outlets | 7 sources across 7 outlets | 3 sources across 3 outlets | 1 source across 1 outlet Thin sourcing, read it as provisional | 3 sources across 3 outlets | 2 sources across 2 outlets | 2 sources across 2 outlets | 2 sources across 2 outlets | 2 sources across 2 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets | 5 sources across 5 outlets | 7 sources across 7 outlets | 7 sources across 6 outlets | 4 sources across 4 outlets |
| Flagged as one to avoid | Not flagged | Not flagged | 6 of 21 research runs | 2 of 11 research runs | 1 of 12 research runs | Not flagged | 3 of 13 research runs | 2 of 3 research runs | 4 of 5 research runs | 4 of 10 research runs | 8 of 9 research runs | 10 of 19 research runs | 11 of 12 research runs | 6 of 11 research runs |
| Announced | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Where to buy | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it | Check it |
Every column is the same research that built the board. Nothing here is a specification sheet copied from a maker. Read how we rank for what a tier and a ladder point mean.